<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>NASAB ANAK HASIL ZINA STUDI KOMPARATIF PANDANGAN IBNU TAYMIYYAH DAN TAQIYYUDDIN AS-SUBKI</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">NIM.: 22103060058</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Muhamad Al Fanni Nurfiqri</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>This study examines the comparative views of Ibn Taymiyyah and Taqiyyuddin&#13;
al-Subki regarding the legal status of the lineage (nasab) of children born as a result of&#13;
adultery. The study is motivated by the differences in the methods of legal reasoning&#13;
(istinbāṭ al-aḥkām) employed by the two scholars in interpreting the prophetic tradition&#13;
(ḥadīth) al-walad li al-firāsh wa li al-'āhir al-ḥajar, particularly in determining the legal&#13;
relationship between a child born out of wedlock and his or her biological father.&#13;
Furthermore, this study aims to explain the relevance of these two perspectives within&#13;
the context of the development of contemporary Islamic family law in Indonesia.&#13;
This study analyzes both perspectives by employing John Austin's Positive Law&#13;
Theory (command theory of law) as its analytical framework, using four principal&#13;
indicators: command, sovereign, sanction, and the separation thesis, which&#13;
distinguishes the domain of law from that of morality. This research adopts a&#13;
qualitative approach based on library research and employs descriptive, analytical,&#13;
and comparative methods.&#13;
The findings indicate that, within Austin's theoretical framework, both juristic&#13;
opinions may be classified as forms of positive morality, namely norms that derive their&#13;
authority from scholarly acceptance and communal recognition rather than direct state&#13;
coercion, insofar as they have not been formally adopted by the sovereign authority of&#13;
the state. Ibn Taymiyyah's opinion demonstrates significant structural compatibility&#13;
with the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010, which recognizes&#13;
the civil relationship between a child born out of wedlock and his or her biological&#13;
father when such a relationship can be established through scientific and technological&#13;
evidence. Both approaches apply Austin's separation thesis by distinguishing the moral&#13;
assessment of adultery from the legal assessment of the rights of children born as a&#13;
consequence of that act. Conversely, al-Subki's opinion reflects the position embodied&#13;
in Article 100 of the Compilation of Islamic Law (Kompilasi Hukum Islam), which&#13;
limits the legal lineage of children born outside marriage exclusively to their mothers&#13;
and their maternal families.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">340.2 Hukum Perbandingan</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2026-08-14</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA;FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUM</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Thesis</mods:genre></mods:mods>