<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>PANDANGAN TOKOH ADAT, TOKOH AGAMA &amp; MASYARAKAT AWAM MENGENAI TRADISI PINTAAN (DESA TANJUNG SETEKO, INDRALAYA, OGAN ILIR)</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">NIM.: 22103060066</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Tuti Alawiyah</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>The phenomenon of Pintaan in the traditional marriage customs of Tanjung&#13;
Seteko Village, Indralaya District, Ogan Ilir Regency, is a customary practice that&#13;
continues to be preserved by the local community. Pintaan refers to a request made by the&#13;
bride's parents to the prospective groom before the marriage ceremony takes place. In&#13;
practice, Pintaan is regarded as a form of respect for the bride's family and a symbol of&#13;
the groom's sincerity and responsibility. However, Pintaan is different from mahr&#13;
(dowry). In Islamic law, mahr is a mandatory gift from the prospective husband to the&#13;
prospective wife and constitutes one of the wife's rights in marriage, whereas Pintaan is a&#13;
customary tradition that originates from local social practices and is neither a pillar nor a&#13;
legal requirement for the validity of marriage. Nevertheless, the amount of Pintaan&#13;
requested often gives rise to differing opinions within the community and is sometimes&#13;
considered burdensome for the groom's family, potentially delaying or hindering&#13;
marriage. Based on this phenomenon, this study addresses three main research questions:&#13;
(1) how traditional leaders, religious leaders, and the general public perceive the Pintaan&#13;
tradition; (2) how the tradition is analyzed through the perspective of Al-Ghazali's theory&#13;
of Maṣlaḥah Mursalah; and (3) how the perspectives of these three groups compare.&#13;
Accordingly, this study aims to examine community perspectives on the Pintaan tradition&#13;
and to analyze it from the perspective of Maṣlaḥah Mursalah.&#13;
This study is field research using a descriptive qualitative approach and an Usul&#13;
Fikih approach. Primary data were obtained through interviews with traditional leaders,&#13;
religious leaders, and community members in Tanjung Seteko Village, supported by&#13;
observation and documentation. Secondary data were collected from books, journals, and&#13;
literature related to marriage customs, Islamic law, and the theory of Maslahah Mursalah.&#13;
The data analysis technique used was descriptive-analytical by describing the informants’&#13;
views and then analyzing them using Al-Ghazali’s theory of Maslahah Mursalah.&#13;
The results of the study indicate that traditional leaders view the Pintaan tradition&#13;
as a cultural heritage that should be preserved because it reflects respect and strengthens&#13;
family relationships. Religious leaders argue that the tradition is permissible as long as it&#13;
does not contradict Islamic law and does not burden the groom’s family. Meanwhile, the&#13;
general public holds diverse views; some consider Pintaan a symbol of responsibility and&#13;
appreciation for women, while others see excessively high Pintaan as an economic&#13;
burden. Based on Al-Ghazali’s theory of Maslahah Mursalah, the Pintaan tradition is&#13;
acceptable because it contains values of public benefit, such as maintaining social&#13;
relationships and honoring women, as long as it is practiced reasonably and does not&#13;
cause harm. Therefore, the Pintaan tradition can still be preserved as part of community&#13;
customs as long as its implementation remains in harmony with the principles of public&#13;
benefit and Islamic teachings.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">340.2 Hukum Perbandingan</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2026-06-17</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA;FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUM</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Thesis</mods:genre></mods:mods>