<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>TINJAUAN SOSIOLOGIS TERHADAP PENGAWETAN DAN DISTRIBUSI DAGING KURBAN PADA PROGRAM “RENDANGMU” DI LAZISMU KLATEN</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">NIM.: 22103080045</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Muhammad Rofiq Alfarizi</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>This study examines the RendangMu Program at Lazismu Klaten through&#13;
three focuses: the reasons for preserving and canning qurbani meat, the&#13;
management flow and the contracts and transactions involved, and the effectiveness&#13;
of distribution together with its social benefit.&#13;
It uses empirical legal research with a descriptive-analytical and&#13;
sociological approach. Primary data were obtained from interviews with eight&#13;
informants consisting of two administrators/program managers and six&#13;
beneficiaries, supported by and documentation. Secondary data include MUI and&#13;
DSN-MUI fatwas, food-safety regulations, official Lazismu publications, and&#13;
relevant previous studies. The data were analyzed through reduction,&#13;
categorization, researcher interpretation, Max Weber’s rationality theory, Anthony&#13;
Giddens’s theory of modernity, Islamic legal analysis, and comparison with prior&#13;
research.&#13;
The findings show that canning was selected in response to the limited shelf&#13;
life, unequal distribution, and geographic limits of fresh meat. The relationship&#13;
between donors and Lazismu contains elements of wakālah that require transparent&#13;
explanation, while animal procurement and processing services constitute separate&#13;
transactions that must be traceable. Distribution is qualitatively effective in&#13;
targeting, timing flexibility, reach, ease of use, and social acceptance, but cannot&#13;
be assessed absolutely because quantitative data on costs, beneficiary coverage,&#13;
and laboratory verification of shelf life remain limited. Normatively, processing&#13;
and delayed distribution are permissible insofar as they comply with Islamic&#13;
requirements, food-safety standards, and demonstrable public benefit.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">340.115 Sosiologi Hukum</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2026-08-24</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA;FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUM</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Thesis</mods:genre></mods:mods>