EKSISTENSI PENCABUTAN PROYEK STRATEGIS NASIONAL PANTAI INDAH KAPUK 2 DI INDONESIA BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN MA NOMOR 12 P/HUM/2025NIM.: 23203012079Moch Fiqri ZainurahmanauthorThis research is motivated by legal issues concerning
the revocation of the National Strategic Project (PSN) status of
Pantai Indah Kapuk (PIK) 2 based on Supreme Court Decision
Number 12 P/HUM/2025, particularly regarding the authority
of regional governments in implementing regional autonomy.
The designation of PIK 2 as a PSN raised issues concerning the
authority of central and regional governments in spatial
planning, licensing, and environmental supervision. In
addition, the revocation of PSN status does not automatically
resolve projects and licenses that had been implemented
previously. These issues are also examined from the perspective
of Maṣlaḥah, namely whether the revocation can prevent
mafsadah and realize public welfare and environmental
protection.
This research aims to analyze the juridical implications
of the revocation of PIK 2’s PSN status for the implementation
of regional autonomy in Indonesia and to examine the urgency
of the revocation from the perspective of Maṣlaḥah. This
research uses library research with a descriptive-analytical
method. The approaches used are the statutory approach and
the conceptual approach. Primary, secondary, and tertiary
legal materials are analyzed through normative qualitative
analysis using legal argumentation.
The results show that Supreme Court Decision Number
12 P/HUM/2025 restores regional government authority in
spatial planning, licensing, and environmental supervision
within the framework of regional autonomy. However, the
revocation has not fully resolved the legal issues because
previously implemented projects and licenses may still cause
regulatory overlap and legal uncertainty. From the perspective
of Maṣlaḥah, the revocation of PIK 2’s PSN status is a
corrective measure that can be categorized as Maṣlaḥah
because it aims to prevent mafsadah and protect the public
interest. However, such benefits cannot be fully achieved
without evaluating existing licenses, spatial planning,
community protection, and environmental restoration.342 Hukum Tata Negara2026-08-07UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA;FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUMThesis