<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Mudharabah Adoption as Institutional Risk Governance Evidence from Coastal Livelihoods in Indonesia</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">-</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Darmawan</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">-</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Agus Faisal</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">-</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Halimah</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">-</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Nadina</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>This study examines the adoption of mudharabah financing in high-risk coastal livelihoods by&#13;
reframing Islamic financial contracts as instruments of institutional risk governance rather than&#13;
purely normative or religious arrangements. It seeks to explain how institutional processes&#13;
shape adoption decisions under conditions of environmental and income uncertainty. A quantitative research design is employed using survey data from 440 coastal economic actors&#13;
in Indonesia. The proposed framework is tested through a serial mediation model using partial&#13;
least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Multi-group analysis is further applied&#13;
to capture contextual variations across geographic settings and fishing-asset ownership&#13;
structures. The findings indicate that access to capital and perceived fairness do not directly influence the&#13;
intention to adopt mudharabah. Their effects are fully transmitted through a sequential&#13;
institutional pathway involving the institutional role of Islamic financial intermediaries, riskmanagement&#13;
practices addressing weather and price volatility, and the formation of&#13;
institutional trust. Multi-group analysis reveals that these institutional pathways are&#13;
significantly stronger in mainland coastal areas and among individual asset owners, suggesting&#13;
that institutional risk governance operates unevenly across contexts.The results suggest that strengthening mudharabah adoption requires more than expanding&#13;
access or emphasizing Shariah compliance. Islamic financial institutions should prioritize&#13;
institutional capacity for risk governance, including contract clarity, distributive fairness, and&#13;
operational risk-management mechanisms, particularly in vulnerable coastal environments  This study contributes to the Islamic finance and development literature by reconceptualizing&#13;
mudharabah adoption as an outcome of institutional risk governance. It positions trust as an&#13;
endogenous result of institutional performance and offers a context-sensitive framework for&#13;
designing Islamic microfinance interventions in high-risk livelihood settings</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">Keuangan Islam</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>Emerald Publishing Limited</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Article</mods:genre></mods:mods>