DINAMIKA PENAFSIRAN QS. AD-DUHA [93]: 7 DALAM HUBUNGANNYA DENGAN DOKTRIN ISMAH AL-ANBIYA’NIM.: 22105030122Azmi Akmal HayaauthorThe interpretation of QS. Aḍ-Ḍuḥā [93]: 7 demonstrates a diversity of meanings since the early period, but began to be filtered and bound by theological frameworks in the medieval era. In the early period, exegetes such as al-Kalbi interpreted the term ḍāllan as "disbeliever" (kafir), which was later deemed problematic by medieval theologians regarding the doctrine of prophethood. As schools of kalam (theology) developed during the medieval era, interpretations of this verse were filtered and reconstructed to align with the doctrine of ‘iṣmah alanbiyā’ (infallibility of the prophets). This study examines the dynamics of the interpretation of QS. Aḍ-Ḍuḥā [93]: 7 and its relationship with the development of the doctrine of ‘iṣmah al-anbiyā’ in the tafsir tradition. Therefore, this study formulates two main research questions: (1) how are the dynamics of the interpretation of QS. Aḍ-Ḍuḥā [93]: 7 within the tafsir tradition, and (2) what is the relationship between these interpretive dynamics and the construction of the doctrine of ‘iṣmah al-anbiyā’? This study is a qualitative library research. Library data were obtained through tafsir works representing three major periods: the early era (exegesis attributed to Mujahid, al-Suddi, al-Kalbi, Muqatil ibn Sulaiman, and al-Farra’), the medieval era (Tafsir al-Tabari, Tafsir al-Maturidi, Tafsir at-Tusi, Tafsir al- Zamakhsyari, Tafsir al-Razi, and Tafsir al-Baidhawi), and the modern era (Tafsir Ibn ‘Ashur, Tafsir al-Tabataba’i, and Tafsir Bint al-Syathi’). Data analysis was conducted by collecting, classifying, and mapping the range of interpretations based on exegetical tendencies, and subsequently correlating them with the development of the doctrine of ‘iṣmah al-anbiyā’. The results reveal two main findings: First, interpretations of QS. Aḍ-Ḍuḥā [93]: 7 from the early to modern eras fall into four categories of meaning: (1) the Prophet’s state of misguidance prior to his prophethood, (2) the Prophet being situated among a misguided community, (3) the Prophet’s unacquaintance with revelation and divine law, and (4) the Prophet’s perplexity in seeking divine guidance prior to his prophethood. Second, interpretations regarding the Prophet’s pre-prophetic condition underwent a dynamic evolution parallel to the development of the doctrine of ‘iṣmah al-anbiyā’. Originating in the early era with a rich diversity of meanings unconstrained by strict doctrinal boundaries, it shifted into the medieval era, where the doctrine of ‘iṣmah became a key element aligning various theological schools to unanimously reject interpretations suggesting moral misguidance. Finally, in the modern era—while still influenced by medieval views—new interpretations emerged based on the Prophet’s spiritual and psychological journey toward receiving revelation. This demonstrates that the relationship between this verse and the doctrine of prophetic infallibility continues to transform alongside evolving analytical approaches.297.1226 Tafsir Al-Qur'an, Ilmu Tafsir2026-08-18UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA;FAKULTAS USHULUDIN DAN PEMIKIRAN ISLAMThesis