{
      "department": "FAKULTAS SYARI’AH DAN HUKUM",
      "subjects": [
        340.2
      ],
      "eprintid": 79645,
      "thesis_type": "skripsi",
      "date": "2026-08-21",
      "userid": 12460,
      "documents": [
          {
            "language": "id",
            "placement": 1,
            "eprintid": 79645,
            "files": [
                {
                  "hash_type": "MD5",
                  "mtime": "2026-10-29 04:47:17",
                  "datasetid": "document",
                  "fileid": 1894278,
                  "objectid": 1087765,
                  "uri": "http:\/\/digilib.uin-suka.ac.id\/id\/file\/1894278",
                  "mime_type": "application\/pdf",
                  "hash": "579333fcc1d7974daca9a174d991193b",
                  "filesize": 8868569,
                  "filename": "20103060075_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf"
                }
            ],
            "content": "published",
            "rev_number": 3,
            "uri": "http:\/\/digilib.uin-suka.ac.id\/id\/document\/1087765",
            "main": "20103060075_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf",
            "mime_type": "application\/pdf",
            "docid": 1087765,
            "format": "text",
            "security": "public",
            "pos": 1,
            "formatdesc": "HUKUM TRANSPLANTASI MENURUT FATWA AMJA (AMERICAN MUSLIM JURISTS ASSOCIATION) DAN IIFA (INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC FIQH ACADEMY)"
          },
          {
            "language": "id",
            "placement": 2,
            "eprintid": 79645,
            "files": [
                {
                  "hash_type": "MD5",
                  "mtime": "2026-10-29 04:47:20",
                  "datasetid": "document",
                  "fileid": 1894281,
                  "objectid": 1087766,
                  "uri": "http:\/\/digilib.uin-suka.ac.id\/id\/file\/1894281",
                  "mime_type": "application\/pdf",
                  "hash": "f06036ec83870f4d153775577b9bb84e",
                  "filesize": 8743181,
                  "filename": "20103060075_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf"
                }
            ],
            "content": "published",
            "rev_number": 3,
            "uri": "http:\/\/digilib.uin-suka.ac.id\/id\/document\/1087766",
            "main": "20103060075_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf",
            "mime_type": "application\/pdf",
            "docid": 1087766,
            "format": "text",
            "security": "validuser",
            "pos": 2,
            "formatdesc": "HUKUM TRANSPLANTASI MENURUT FATWA AMJA (AMERICAN MUSLIM JURISTS ASSOCIATION) DAN IIFA (INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC FIQH ACADEMY)"
          }
      ],
      "rev_number": 10,
      "creators": [
        {
          "name": {
            "lineage": null,
            "given": "NIM.: 20103060075",
            "honourific": null,
            "family": "Muhammad Galih Sampurna"
          }
        }
      ],
      "dir": "disk0\/00\/07\/96\/45",
      "keywords": "Transplantasi Organ Tubuh, AMJA, IIFA, Perbandingan\r\nHukum",
      "lastmod": "2026-11-02 04:39:44",
      "ispublished": "pub",
      "metadata_visibility": "show",
      "date_type": "published",
      "eprint_status": "archive",
      "status_changed": "2026-11-02 04:39:44",
      "datestamp": "2026-11-02 04:39:44",
      "uri": "http:\/\/digilib.uin-suka.ac.id\/id\/eprint\/79645",
      "thesis_name": "other",
      "note": "Surur Roiqoh, S.H.I., M.H.",
      "full_text_status": "restricted",
      "contact_email": "muh.khabib@uin-suka.ac.id",
      "divisions": [
        "jur_pma"
      ],
      "abstract": "Organ transplantation represents a significant development in\r\nmodern medicine; however, the practice sparks debate within Islamic legal\r\nperspectives regarding ethics, Sharia boundaries, and the protection of\r\nhuman rights. The American Muslim Jurists Association (AMJA) and the\r\nInternational Islamic Fiqh Academy (IIFA)—two prominent fatwa-issuing\r\nbodies—hold views that frequently serve as references for addressing these\r\ncontemporary issues. This study is motivated by the need for a\r\ncomprehensive understanding of how these two institutions determine the\r\nlegal status of organ transplantation, particularly amidst advancements in\r\nmedical technology and the growing demand for organ donors within\r\nMuslim communities. Consequently, this research addresses two primary\r\nquestions: first, why do differences in opinion exist between AMJA and IIFA\r\nregarding the law on organ transplantation and second, what are the results\r\nof a comparative analysis of their views using the theory of comparative law\r\nThis study employs a qualitative method based on library research\r\nwith a normative approach. Primary data were obtained from the official\r\nfatwas of AMJA and IIFA, while secondary data were derived from relevant\r\nbooks, journals, and scholarly works. Data analysis utilizes the comparative\r\nlaw theory proposed by Ratno Lutiko, applying epistemological,\r\nmethodological, and substantive comparative methods. Through this\r\ncomparative law framework, the author identifies the reasons behind the\r\ndivergent views held by AMJA and IIFA regarding organ transplantation\r\nlaws and presents a comparative analysis of their respective positions on the\r\nmatter.\r\nResearch findings indicate that both AMJA and IIFA permit organ\r\ntransplantation, subject to strict conditions. AMJA tends to adopt a more\r\nflexible stance by considering the social context and medical needs of the\r\nMuslim community in America, emphasizing voluntary consent, the\r\nprohibition of organ commercialization, and the objective of saving lives. As\r\nan international body, IIFA is more cautious, emphasizing the universal\r\naspects of Sharia, the protection of human dignity, and the necessity of\r\nadhering to standardized medical and ethical procedures. Both agree that\r\norgan transplantation must not involve actions that damage the body without\r\na valid Sharia justification and must align with the principles of maqasid alshari'ah\r\n(objectives of Sharia), particularly the preservation of life hifz alnafs.\r\nThe differences in the fatwas issued by AMJA (Assembly of Muslim\r\nJurists of America) and IIFA (International Islamic Fiqh Academy) lie in\r\ntheir nature, level of detail, and legal approaches. AMJA tends to be more\r\npractical, flexible, and responsive to the context of Muslim minority\r\ncommunities in the West—for instance, by permitting hair transplants and\r\napplying more lenient requirements for organ transplantation from deceased\r\ndonors. Conversely, IIFA establishes rules that are more cautious, detailed,\r\nand globally comprehensive, reflecting the collective ijtihad (independent legal reasoning) of international scholars; this includes imposing strict\r\nconditions for transplants from deceased donors, prohibiting transplants\r\ninvolving organs removed via hadd or qisas punishments, and explicitly\r\nbanning the harvesting of brain cells from living fetuses.",
      "type": "thesis",
      "title": "HUKUM TRANSPLANTASI MENURUT FATWA AMJA (AMERICAN MUSLIM JURISTS ASSOCIATION) DAN IIFA (INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC FIQH ACADEMY)",
      "institution": "UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA",
      "pages": 130
    }