<> "The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license."^^ . <> . . . "KONSTITUSIONALITAS PENGUJIAN UNDANG-UNDANG HASIL RATIFIKASI PERJANJIAN INTERNASIONAL OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI PERSPEKTIF SIYASAH QADHA’IYYAH"^^ . "The authority of the Constitutional Court (MK) to review laws ratifying\r\ninternational treaties, along with the implications of this authority for the\r\nprotection of citizens constitutional rights and the supremacy of the constitution,\r\nremains a subject of ongoing debate within Indonesian constitutional law. This\r\ndebate arises from the position of ratification laws at the intersection of national\r\nand international law, particularly regarding the possibility of reviewing them\r\nagainst the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This study examines\r\nthe constitutional perspective on the Constitutional Court's review of laws\r\nratifying international treaties and analyses the implications of such reviews from\r\nthe perspective of siyasah qadha’iyyah (Islamic judicial policy).\r\nThis study employs a normative-juridical approach, utilising a literature\r\nreview method that examines relevant legislation, legal doctrines, and\r\nConstitutional Court rulings. A systematic analysis is conducted to understand the\r\nbasis of the Court's authority and its impact on the relationship between\r\nnational ,international law and fiqh siyasah.\r\nThe result of this research indicate that the Constitutional Court possesses\r\nthe constitutional authority to review ratification laws because, once ratified,\r\ninternational treaties become part of the national legal system in the form of\r\nstatutes that must comply with the constitution. Such review serves as a crucial\r\nmechanism for ensuring the conformity of legal norms with the 1945 Constitution\r\nwhile simultaneously protecting citizens' constitutional rights. However, the\r\ninvalidation of a ratification law by the Court applies only within the domestic\r\nlegal sphere and does not automatically terminate Indonesia's obligations under\r\nthe international treaty in question. The Court's authority to review ratification\r\nlaws embodies the principle of constitutionalism, which establishes the\r\nconstitution as the supreme law of the state. From the perspective of siyasah\r\nqadha’iyyah, this role reflects the function of the judiciary in safeguarding the\r\nconstitution, protecting citizens' rights, and upholding the principles of the rule of\r\nlaw."^^ . "2026-08-19" . . . . "UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA"^^ . . . "FAKULTAS SYARI’AH DAN HUKUM, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA"^^ . . . . . . . . . "NIM.: 20103070096"^^ . "Muhammad Fadhil Irvansyah Antero Persada"^^ . "NIM.: 20103070096 Muhammad Fadhil Irvansyah Antero Persada"^^ . . . . . . "KONSTITUSIONALITAS PENGUJIAN UNDANG-UNDANG HASIL RATIFIKASI PERJANJIAN INTERNASIONAL OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI PERSPEKTIF SIYASAH QADHA’IYYAH (Text)"^^ . . . . . "20103070096_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf"^^ . . . "KONSTITUSIONALITAS PENGUJIAN UNDANG-UNDANG HASIL RATIFIKASI PERJANJIAN INTERNASIONAL OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI PERSPEKTIF SIYASAH QADHA’IYYAH (Text)"^^ . . . . "HTML Summary of #79646 \n\nKONSTITUSIONALITAS PENGUJIAN UNDANG-UNDANG HASIL RATIFIKASI PERJANJIAN INTERNASIONAL OLEH MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI PERSPEKTIF SIYASAH QADHA’IYYAH\n\n" . "text/html" . . . "342 Hukum Tata Negara" . .