Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga YogyakartaPERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN TERHADAP REKAYASA IKLAN INFLUENCER DI TIKTOK PERSPEKTIF HUKUM EKONOMI SYARIAHNIM.: 22103080061Zahrah Nur FadillaauthorInfluencer advertising on TikTok increasingly relies on soft selling, blurring the line between personal content and commercial promotion. When paid partnerships go undisclosed, consumers choose on incomplete information, jeopardizing the right to accurate information and the principle of mutual consent in muamalah. This study examines influencers‟ advertisement engineering on TikTok and its review under Islamic economic law and consumer protection law. This descriptive-analytical field study with an empirical juridical approach collected data through non-participant observation of twelve videos by six influencers and their comment sections, semi-structured interviews with micro-influencers and purposively selected consumers, and documentation. Descriptive qualitative analysis was validated through source triangulation. The framework rests on maṣlaḥah mursalah and mutual consent (tarāḍin), using tadlīs, gharar, and najasy as assessment parameters, combined with Law Number 8 of 1999. The findings show that advertisement engineering occurs within commercial cooperation with brands and falls into three groups: technical and aesthetic engineering; information engineering (framing, overclaiming, and inconsistent disclosure of commercial status); and the shaping of perceived popularity or purchase urgency. Engineering is essentially neutral and becomes problematic only when it alters or conceals material facts. Under Islamic economic law, technical and aesthetic engineering that does not affect material facts remains permissible, whereas disguised commercial relationships and disproportionate claims contain elements of tadlīs, and unclear product benefits relate to gharar. Najasy was not proven, as no fake comments or accounts were found. From the consumer protection perspective, misleading practices contravene Article 4 letter c and Article 7 letter b of the Consumer Protection Law, while influencers‟ liability is differentiated by role and established through Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code. Consumer protection remains suboptimal, so transparency of commercial information must be strengthened by all parties involved.343.071 Perlindungan Konsumen2026-08-31UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA;FAKULTAS SYARI’AH DAN HUKUMThesis

For work being deposited by its own author: In self-archiving this collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata, I grant Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta the right to store them and to make them permanently available publicly for free on-line. I declare that this material is my own intellectual property and I understand that Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta does not assume any responsibility if there is any breach of copyright in distributing these files or metadata. (All authors are urged to prominently assert their copyright on the title page of their work.)

For work being deposited by someone other than its author: I hereby declare that the collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata that I am archiving at Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta) is in the public domain. If this is not the case, I accept full responsibility for any breach of copyright that distributing these files or metadata may entail.

Clicking on the deposit button indicates your agreement to these terms.