<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>ANALISIS DISKRIMINAN KUADRATIK ROBUST DENGAN ESTIMATOR MINIMUM COVARIANCE DETERMINANT (MCD)</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">NIM.: 22106010083</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Fernanda Devita Sukma</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>Disparities in poverty levels among regencies/cities in East Java Province require a&#13;
classification method capable of accurately grouping regions to support the&#13;
formulation of appropriately targeted policies. Quadratic Discriminant Analysis&#13;
(QDA) is a multivariate classification method that accommodates differences in&#13;
covariance matrices among groups; however, its parameter estimation is sensitive&#13;
to the presence of outliers. This study aims to compare the classification&#13;
performance of classical QDA and robust QDA using the Minimum Covariance&#13;
Determinant (MCD) estimator in classifying the poverty levels of 38&#13;
regencies/cities in East Java Province in 2024 based on five socioeconomic&#13;
indicators. The analysis consisted of multivariate normality testing using the&#13;
Henze–Zirkler test, outlier detection using Mahalanobis distance, construction of&#13;
classical QDA and QDA Robust-MCD models, and model evaluation using the&#13;
Apparent Error Rate (APER) and classification accuracy. The results showed that&#13;
the data did not satisfy the multivariate normality assumption, and three outlier&#13;
observations were identified among the 38 regencies/cities analyzed. Classical&#13;
QDA achieved a classification accuracy of 78.95% with an APER of 0.2105,&#13;
whereas QDA Robust-MCD achieved an accuracy of 71.05% with an APER of&#13;
0.2895. The comparison results indicate that classical QDA provided better&#13;
classification performance than QDA Robust-MCD based on both classification&#13;
accuracy and APER. Thus, for the data analyzed in this study, the use of the MCD&#13;
estimator did not result in improved classification performance compared with&#13;
classical QDA.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">515.6 Metode Analitik - Matematika</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2026-08-13</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA;FAKULTAS SAINS DAN TEKNOLOGI</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Thesis</mods:genre></mods:mods>