Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga YogyakartaPENGATURAN HAKIM MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DARI UNSUR MAHKAMAH AGUNG (Studi Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2020)NIM.: 21103040006Muhammad Raihan MajidauthorThe controversy surrounding the regulation on the appointment of Constitutional Court justices originating from the Supreme Court, as stipulated in Article 15 paragraph (2) letter h of Law Number 7 of 2020 concerning the Third Amendment to the Constitutional Court Law, in fact still raises questions. The regulation of the a quo article in the Third Amendment to the Constitutional Court Law is alleged to contradict the mandate of the 1945 Constitution. At the same time, the implications of the a quo article affect the authority among the proposing institutions as well as the sustainability of every citizen’s constitutional right to have the opportunity to become a candidate for Constitutional Court justice from the Supreme Court environment. This study employs a descriptive library research method using a normative juridical approach. The analysis is conducted through statute and conceptual approaches, with data collected from relevant legal literature and examined using qualitative analysis. The results of this study lead to two simple conclusions. First, Article 15 paragraph (2) letter h of the third revision of the Constitutional Court Law (UUMK), viewed from the perspective of the Stufenbau Theory as the basis for analyzing the a quo article, indicates that the normative regulation of Article 15 paragraph (2) letter h of the third revision of the UUMK is contrary to the spirit of the 1945 Constitution. Second, based on the principle of equality before the law, this has implications for and impacts the unequal treatment among institutions proposing Constitutional Court judges. This also affects the sustainability of the constitutional rights of citizens, other than Supreme Court justices and high court judges, to have equal opportunities under the law and government to become candidates for Constitutional Court judges from the Supreme Court element.340 Ilmu Hukum2026-07-01UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA;FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUMThesis

For work being deposited by its own author: In self-archiving this collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata, I grant Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta the right to store them and to make them permanently available publicly for free on-line. I declare that this material is my own intellectual property and I understand that Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta does not assume any responsibility if there is any breach of copyright in distributing these files or metadata. (All authors are urged to prominently assert their copyright on the title page of their work.)

For work being deposited by someone other than its author: I hereby declare that the collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata that I am archiving at Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta) is in the public domain. If this is not the case, I accept full responsibility for any breach of copyright that distributing these files or metadata may entail.

Clicking on the deposit button indicates your agreement to these terms.