Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga YogyakartaPENAHANAN AKTA CERAI SEBAGAI SANKSI ADMINISTRATIF PUTUSAN NAFKAH PASCA PERCERAIAN (ANALISIS KOMPARATIF TUJUH PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA TENTANG PENAHANAN AKTA CERAI TAHUN 2024–2025)NIM.: 23203012049Zamhura WildanauthorThe enforcement of post-divorce maintenance (alimony/child support) rulings within the Religious Courts remains problematic, primarily due to the low level of voluntary compliance by former husbands and the relative ineffectiveness of civil execution mechanisms. To address these issues, the Supreme Court issued Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Number 3 of 2017 and Supreme Court Circular (SEMA) Number 2 of 2019, which link the fulfillment of maintenance obligations to the pronouncement of the “talak” (divorce declaration) and the issuance of the official divorce certificate. This study aims to analyze the regulations governing the enforcement of post-divorce maintenance rulings within the procedural law of Indonesia’s Religious Courts, the legal basis for a judge’s authority to withhold divorce certificates, and the practice of withholding such certificates from the perspectives of justice, utility, and legal certainty. This study employs an empirical legal research methodology, examining primary data derived from interviews with Religious Court judges and secondary data, including literature reviews and an analysis of five court rulings. All data were analyzed using a descriptive qualitative approach, incorporating both statutory and conceptual frameworks to address the research questions. The findings indicate that, first, the current regulatory framework for enforcing post-divorce maintenance based on substantive law, civil procedural law, and Supreme Court policies has yet to effectively provide protection when the party obligated to pay maintenance fails to do so voluntarily. Second, the practice of withholding divorce certificates represents a form of “judicial discovery of law” (rechtsvinding) an interpretive approach applied in the absence of explicit statutory norms whereby judges interpret existing regulations and Supreme Court policies to ensure the fulfillment of the economic rights of women and children. Third, when viewed through the lens of Gustav Radbruch’s legal philosophy, this practice strongly realizes the values of justice and utility; however, it requires more robust and uniform legislative regulation to ensure greater legal certainty.348.04 Kasus Pengadilan, Perkara Pengadilan2026-09-28UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA;FAKULTAS SYARI’AH DAN HUKUMThesis

For work being deposited by its own author: In self-archiving this collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata, I grant Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta the right to store them and to make them permanently available publicly for free on-line. I declare that this material is my own intellectual property and I understand that Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta does not assume any responsibility if there is any breach of copyright in distributing these files or metadata. (All authors are urged to prominently assert their copyright on the title page of their work.)

For work being deposited by someone other than its author: I hereby declare that the collection of files and associated bibliographic metadata that I am archiving at Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta) is in the public domain. If this is not the case, I accept full responsibility for any breach of copyright that distributing these files or metadata may entail.

Clicking on the deposit button indicates your agreement to these terms.