eprintid: 79953
rev_number: 10
eprint_status: archive
userid: 12460
dir: disk0/00/07/99/53
datestamp: 2026-11-11 04:36:03
lastmod: 2026-11-11 04:36:03
status_changed: 2026-11-11 04:36:03
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
contact_email: muh.khabib@uin-suka.ac.id
creators_name: Zamhura Wildan, NIM.: 23203012049
title: PENAHANAN AKTA CERAI SEBAGAI SANKSI ADMINISTRATIF PUTUSAN NAFKAH PASCA PERCERAIAN  (ANALISIS KOMPARATIF TUJUH PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA TENTANG PENAHANAN AKTA CERAI TAHUN 2024–2025)
ispublished: pub
subjects: 348.04
divisions: ilmu_sya
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: Penahanan Akta Cerai, Nafkah Pasca Perceraian, Pengadilan Agama, Penemuan Hukum, Keadilan, Kepastian Hukum
note: Prof. Dr. H. Riyanta, M.Hum.
abstract: The enforcement of post-divorce maintenance (alimony/child support) rulings within the Religious Courts remains problematic, primarily due to the low level of voluntary compliance by former husbands and the relative ineffectiveness of civil execution mechanisms. To address these issues, the Supreme Court issued Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Number 3 of 2017 and Supreme Court Circular (SEMA) Number 2 of 2019, which link the fulfillment of maintenance obligations to the pronouncement of the “talak” (divorce declaration) and the issuance of the official divorce certificate. This study aims to analyze the regulations governing the enforcement of post-divorce maintenance rulings within the procedural law of Indonesia’s Religious Courts, the legal basis for a judge’s authority to withhold divorce certificates, and the practice of withholding such certificates from the perspectives of justice, utility, and legal certainty.

This study employs an empirical legal research methodology, examining primary data derived from interviews with Religious Court judges and secondary data, including literature reviews and an analysis of five court rulings. All data were analyzed using a descriptive qualitative approach, incorporating both statutory and conceptual frameworks to address the research questions.

The findings indicate that, first, the current regulatory framework for enforcing post-divorce maintenance based on substantive law, civil procedural law, and Supreme Court policies has yet to effectively provide protection when the party obligated to pay maintenance fails to do so voluntarily. Second, the practice of withholding divorce certificates represents a form of “judicial discovery of law” (rechtsvinding) an interpretive approach applied in the absence of explicit statutory norms whereby judges interpret existing regulations and Supreme Court policies to ensure the fulfillment of the economic rights of women and children. Third, when viewed through the lens of Gustav Radbruch’s legal philosophy, this practice strongly realizes the values of justice and utility; however, it requires more robust and uniform legislative regulation to ensure greater legal certainty.
date: 2026-09-28
date_type: published
pages: 258
institution: UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
department: FAKULTAS SYARI’AH DAN HUKUM
thesis_type: skripsi
thesis_name: other
citation:   Zamhura Wildan, NIM.: 23203012049  (2026) PENAHANAN AKTA CERAI SEBAGAI SANKSI ADMINISTRATIF PUTUSAN NAFKAH PASCA PERCERAIAN (ANALISIS KOMPARATIF TUJUH PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA TENTANG PENAHANAN AKTA CERAI TAHUN 2024–2025).  Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.   
document_url: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/79953/1/23203012049_BAB-I_DAN-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf
document_url: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/79953/2/23203012049_BAB-II-SAMPAI-SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf