TY  - JOUR
ID  - digilib8463
UR  - https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/8463/
A1  - JAMAL ABDUL AZIZ, -
Y1  - 2005/01/01/
N2  - It is an undoubtedly fact that Islamic law basically has two different aspects with
its opponent nature between them. It has absolute, sacred, and eternal aspects on one
side; and relative, profane, and contextual aspects on the other side. The problem is
how we can identify that a rule of Islamic law is absolute and eternal while the other
one is relative and dynamic. In order to overcome this problem among the Islamic
jurists offered several theories about sorting the body of Islamic law into two
categories dichotomically. Those theories are ?iba>dat-mu?a>mala>t, qat}?i>-z}anni>,
shari>?ah-fiqh, and ta?abbudi>-ta?aqquli> dichotomy. From the discussion about such
theories, the author concludes that although those theories of dichotomy are very useful
and helpful to understand the body of Islamic law with such opponent nature
nevertheless it is still needed more efforts to do the dichotomy clear and applicable
enough.
JF  - Jurnal Hermeneia\Vol-4-No-1-2005
KW  - mutlak
KW  -  nisbi
KW  -  dikhotomi
KW  -  ?iba>dat-mu?a>mala>t
KW  -  qat}?i>-z}anni>
KW  -  syariahfikih
KW  - 
dan ta?abbudi>-ta?aqquli>
TI  - DILEMA HUKUM ISLAM ANTARA KEMUTLAKAN DAN KENISBIAN
AV  - public
ER  -