PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TENAGA NON MEDIS PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA ABORSI BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 36 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG KESEHATAN (Analisis Putusan Nomor 212/Pid.Sus/2011/PN.Pso)

NOVA RAMDANI, NIM.: 16340016 (2021) PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TENAGA NON MEDIS PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA ABORSI BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 36 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG KESEHATAN (Analisis Putusan Nomor 212/Pid.Sus/2011/PN.Pso). Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

Preview	Text (PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TENAGA NON MEDIS PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA ABORSI BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 36 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG KESEHATAN (Analisis Putusan Nomor 212/Pid.Sus/2011/PN.Pso)) 16340016_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (4MB) | Preview
	Text (PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TENAGA NON MEDIS PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA ABORSI BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 36 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG KESEHATAN (Analisis Putusan Nomor 212/Pid.Sus/2011/PN.Pso)) 16340016_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (3MB)

Abstract

Abortion is an abortion or in other words, the removal of the product of conception before the fetus is not able to live outside the womb by terminating the life of the fetus before being given a chance to live. Based on Decision Number: 212/Pid.Sus/PN.Pso. Whereas Rahima S Borahima (the defendant) who is a Civil Servant is found guilty of committing the crime of abortion as referred to in Article 194 jo. Article 75 paragraph (2) of Law Number 36 Year 2009 about Health. The judge handed down a verdict with 10 month imprisonment and a fine of Rp. 10.000.000.00 (ten million rupiahs), which should be a maximum of 10 years in prison and a fine of Rp. 1.000.000.000 ( one billion rupiah ). This type and research is library research (library research) with a normative juridical approach. The method of legal analysis is descriptive analytical by providing a systematic and logical explanation and then analyzing it. Meanwhile, the method of colleting legal materials is by examining legal sources, in the form of primary and secondary data sources. The results of this study are that the criminal responsibility of non-medical personnel who perpetrates the crime of abortion as regulated in law Number 36 of 2009 concerning Health, remains based on the existence of criminal acts and the existence of mistakes. However, it does not contain anything specially regarding the subject of criminal conviction abortion perpetrator.

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item