PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN OLEH PENGADILAN NEGERI DI TINJAU DARI YURISPRUDENSI NOMOR 1/YUR/PERKONS/2018 (Studi Putusan Nomor 41/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2019/PN.Tsm)

MUHAMMAD IHZA SATRIANSYAH, NIM. 17103040117 (2021) PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN OLEH PENGADILAN NEGERI DI TINJAU DARI YURISPRUDENSI NOMOR 1/YUR/PERKONS/2018 (Studi Putusan Nomor 41/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2019/PN.Tsm). Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

Preview	Text (PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN OLEH PENGADILAN NEGERI DI TINJAU DARI YURISPRUDENSI NOMOR 1/YUR/PERKONS/2018 (Studi Putusan Nomor 41/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2019/PN.Tsm)) 17103040117_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (2MB) | Preview
	Text (PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN OLEH PENGADILAN NEGERI DI TINJAU DARI YURISPRUDENSI NOMOR 1/YUR/PERKONS/2018 (Studi Putusan Nomor 41/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2019/PN.Tsm)) 17103040117_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (4MB)

Abstract

The Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) is the agency authorized to handle and resolve consumer disputes by means of mediation or arbitration or conciliation. However, in practice, many parties object to the decision issued by BPSK and submit its cancellation to the court, one of the reasons for objections that are often found is the authority of BPSK in resolving consumer disputes. Even recently, there are still many objections to the court regarding this matter, including the case to be analyzed, namely the case of the Tasikmalaya District Court Number 41/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2019/PN.Tsm. The problems that will be discussed are the reasons for business actors to file an objection to the BPSK decision number 025/A/BPSK-KOTA.TSM/X/2019 to the Tasikmalaya District Court and the consideration of the Tasikmalaya District Court judge in case number 41/Pdt.Sus- BPSK/2019 /PN.Tsm is reviewed based on Jurisprudence number 1/Yur/Perkons/2018. The method used in this research is using juridical research approach normative with the type of research that will be used is library research. The data that has been collected will be analyzed qualitatively by describing the content and structure of positive law with the aim of determining the meaning of legal regulations related to research. The theoretical framework that will be discussed is the theory of legal certainty, agreement theory, consumer protection theory, and dispute resolution theory. The results of the study on the decision of the Tasikmalaya District Court Number 41/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2019/PN.Tsm. shows that BPSK is not authorized to adjudicate disputes arising from the financing and credit agreements in question. This is also in line with the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia number 1/Yur/Perkons/2018, which states that disputes arising from consumer financing agreements are not consumer disputes so that the dispute is not under the authority of BPSK.

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item