PENAFSIRAN HAKIM TERHADAP ALASAN MENDESAK DALAM PERMOHONAN DISPENSASI KAWIN DAN KESESUAINNYA DENGAN KONSEP PERLINDUNGAN ANAK (STUDI PUTUSAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA PURWOREJO TAHUN 2020)

FAJAR WAHYU MUSTIKOWATI, NIM: 18103040004 (2022) PENAFSIRAN HAKIM TERHADAP ALASAN MENDESAK DALAM PERMOHONAN DISPENSASI KAWIN DAN KESESUAINNYA DENGAN KONSEP PERLINDUNGAN ANAK (STUDI PUTUSAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA PURWOREJO TAHUN 2020). Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

Preview	Text (PENAFSIRAN HAKIM TERHADAP ALASAN MENDESAK DALAM PERMOHONAN DISPENSASI KAWIN DAN KESESUAINNYA DENGAN KONSEP PERLINDUNGAN ANAK (STUDI PUTUSAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA PURWOREJO TAHUN 2020)) 18103040004_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (3MB) | Preview
	Text (PENAFSIRAN HAKIM TERHADAP ALASAN MENDESAK DALAM PERMOHONAN DISPENSASI KAWIN DAN KESESUAINNYA DENGAN KONSEP PERLINDUNGAN ANAK (STUDI PUTUSAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA PURWOREJO TAHUN 2020)) 18103040004_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (2MB)

Abstract

The reason for urgency in a accordance with Article 7 Paragraf (2) are no other chices and it is imperative that a marriege takes place. The regulation does not provide strict limits on urgent reason, so that there needs to be thoroughness and caution for judges in formulating whether the urgents reason have been fulfilled or not in the granting of the application for marriage dispensation. The emphasis on the exitence of urgent reasons and sufficient evidence is actually to press so that underage marriages are not carried out. In this study, the authors examine several 2020 decisions at the Purworejo Religious Court to see the interpretation of the judges’ legal rights regarding the urgent reason for applying for a marriage dispensation and their relevance to the concept of child protection. The research method used was descruptive analytical study with a juridical approach to examine the legal interpretation of the judges on the concept of urgent reasons proposed by the parties in the dispensation application and the suitability of the interpretation with the concept of child protection in the applicable laws and regulation. This study uses interview data collection techniques and observations on decisions to obtain information related to urgent reasons which are interpreted and determined by the judges at the Purworejo Religious Court. The theory used is the theory of child protection to analyzw the decision data studied and primary legal materials and secondary legal materials that are used as references in the analysis, as well as the results of interviews wirh judges at he Purworejo Religious Court. The result of this study revaled: Frist, the urgent reasons for granting dispensation for marrige were the child was already pregnant, the relationship was too far, the education was law, and the parents were worried. Second, there was no relevance between Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning Marriage and the concept of child protection. This can be seen from the judge’s decision that granted the application for dispencation for marriage only to protect children from disscrimination from the surrounding community, but overrode other children’s rights.

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item