TINJAUAN YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA MENGEDARKAN SEDIAAN FARMASI OBAT TANPA IZIN EDAR (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 285/PID.SUS/2018/PN SMN DAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 45/PID.SUS/2020/PN MTK)

Anita Kurnia Utami, NIM.: 18103040053 (2022) TINJAUAN YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA MENGEDARKAN SEDIAAN FARMASI OBAT TANPA IZIN EDAR (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 285/PID.SUS/2018/PN SMN DAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 45/PID.SUS/2020/PN MTK). Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

Preview	Text (TINJAUAN YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA MENGEDARKAN SEDIAAN FARMASI OBAT TANPA IZIN EDAR (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 285/PID.SUS/2018/PN SMN DAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 45/PID.SUS/2020/PN MTK)) 18103040053_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (3MB) | Preview
	Text (TINJAUAN YURIDIS TINDAK PIDANA MENGEDARKAN SEDIAAN FARMASI OBAT TANPA IZIN EDAR (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 285/PID.SUS/2018/PN SMN DAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 45/PID.SUS/2020/PN MTK)) 18103040053_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (716kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Indonesia is a state of law, which means that all aspects of life in Indonesia are regulated by law. The highest source of Indonesian law is the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, in which the ideals and national goals of the Indonesian nation are written. The general welfare is one of the important aspects of the ideals and national goals of the Indonesian nation. One of the efforts to achieve general welfare is to seek public health. Public health efforts go hand in hand with the emergence of criminal acts in the health sector, one of which is the crime of distributing pharmaceutical drug preparations without a distribution permit which is regulated in Article 197 of Law Number 36 of 2009 concerning Health. Cases regarding the distribution of pharmaceutical preparations, especially drugs, are rife, the drugs are circulated and traded freely to the public at relatively low prices. This research uses case studies of Decision Number 285/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Smn and Decision Number 45/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Mtk. Research on the two decisions aims to determine the cause of differences in the application of criminal sanctions or criminal disparities in the two decisions. The type of research in this study is library research, which is a method of collecting written data, sourced from Decision Number 285/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Smn and Decision Number 45/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Mtk, books, legislation, and written data related to this research. The approach in this research is normative juridical. This research is analytical descriptive, a method that functions to describe or provide an overview of the object under study through data or samples that have been collected as they are without analyzing and making conclusions that apply to the public. The results of the study show that in deciding a case, the judge's considerations are very important, these considerations include juridical considerations, sociological considerations, and philosophical considerations. These three considerations are important aspects so that judges can impose sanctions based on justice. Then the research also shows the factors that cause differences in the judges' decisions in Decision Number 285/Pid.Sus/2018/PN Smn and Decision Number 45/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Mtk, including the number of drugs (evidence) found, the reasons or motivations of the perpetrators, the consequences and other facts found in the trial.

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item