TINJAUAN NORMA HUKUM PERATURAN DAERAH DKI JAKARTA NO. 2 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG KEWAJIBAN VAKSINASI COVID-19 PERSPEKTIF USHUL FIKIH

Yusuf Pahlevi, NIM.: 18103070061 (2022) TINJAUAN NORMA HUKUM PERATURAN DAERAH DKI JAKARTA NO. 2 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG KEWAJIBAN VAKSINASI COVID-19 PERSPEKTIF USHUL FIKIH. Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

[img]
Preview
Text (TINJAUAN NORMA HUKUM PERATURAN DAERAH DKI JAKARTA NO. 2 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG KEWAJIBAN VAKSINASI COVID-19 PERSPEKTIF USHUL FIKIH)
18103070061_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version

Download (3MB) | Preview
[img] Text (TINJAUAN NORMA HUKUM PERATURAN DAERAH DKI JAKARTA NO. 2 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG KEWAJIBAN VAKSINASI COVID-19 PERSPEKTIF USHUL FIKIH)
18103070061_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (4MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

DKI Jakarta Regional Regulation No. 2 of 2020 concerning the Prevention of Corona Virus Disease 2019 contains criminal provisions for those who refuse the Covid-19 vaccination. This raises pros and cons in the community, Pro's opinion states that with the existence of a fine, the community will vaccinate and create herd immunity (mass immunity). However, the contra opinion states that there are many other ways besides fines, and they are not in line with Law no. 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine, Law no. 4 of 1984 concerning Outbreaks of Infectious Diseases, and Law no. 36 of 2009 concerning Health. This thesis is a normative legal research (juridical normative) which examines library materials with secondary databases to find conflicting legal norms Article 30 of DKI Regional Regulation No. 2 of 2020 concerning Handling Corona Virus Disease 2019 with the Act it refers to. This research also uses a statute approach, a case approach, and a conceptual approach. The data obtained will be analyzed by descriptive-qualitative method. The theoretical framework used to analyze the problem includes the theory of the hierarchy of legal norms, the hermeneutic theory, and the rules in Ushul Fiqh. The results showed that the DKI Jakarta Regional Regulation No. 2 of 2020 concerning the Prevention of Corona Virus Disease 2019 Article 30 Contrary to Article 5 Paragraph 3 of Law no. 36 of 2009 concerning Health, in which health is a right, not an obligation, also contradicts Article 93 of Law no. 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine in terms of the criminal formulation, namely that there must be an impact on the community as a result of someone refusing the vaccine, and contrary to Article 14 Paragraph 1 of Law no. 4 of 1984 concerning Outbreaks of Communicable Diseases in terms of the maximum nominal fine of one million rupiah. DKI Jakarta Regional Regulation No. 2 of 2020 concerning the Handling of Corona Virus Disease 2019 is contrary to Ushuliyah Lughawiyyah in terms of Nash, and Nash Signs with Article 5 Paragraph 3 of Law No. 36 of 2009 concerning Health, , also contradicts Article 93 of Law no. 6 of 2018 concerning Health Quarantine, but in accordance with Article 14 Paragraph 1 of Law no. 4 of 1984 concerning Outbreaks of Communicable Diseases by Sign and Like Nash, the drawback is that there is a nominal difference in the number of fines. In addition, al dharar allows punishment for vaccine refusal.

Item Type: Thesis (Skripsi)
Additional Information: Pembimbing: Nilman Ghofur, M.Sos
Uncontrolled Keywords: Norma Hukum, Vaksinasi, Ushul Fikih
Subjects: Hukum Islam > Fiqih > Usul Fiqh
Covid-19
Divisions: Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum > Hukum Tata Negara (S-1)
Depositing User: Muh Khabib SIP.
Date Deposited: 27 Oct 2022 08:27
Last Modified: 27 Oct 2022 08:27
URI: http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/54541

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
Chat Kak Imum