MEKANISME PEMBENTUKAN UNDANG-UNDANG BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 12 TAHUN 2011 DITINJAU DARI ASAS KEPASTIAN HUKUM (STUDI ATAS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 91/PUU-XVIII/2020)

Rahmatika Monati, NIM.: 19103040046 (2023) MEKANISME PEMBENTUKAN UNDANG-UNDANG BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 12 TAHUN 2011 DITINJAU DARI ASAS KEPASTIAN HUKUM (STUDI ATAS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 91/PUU-XVIII/2020). Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

Preview	Text (MEKANISME PEMBENTUKAN UNDANG-UNDANG BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 12 TAHUN 2011 DITINJAU DARI ASAS KEPASTIAN HUKUM (STUDI ATAS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 91/PUU-XVIII/2020)) 19103040046_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (3MB) | Preview
	Text (MEKANISME PEMBENTUKAN UNDANG-UNDANG BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 12 TAHUN 2011 DITINJAU DARI ASAS KEPASTIAN HUKUM (STUDI ATAS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 91/PUU-XVIII/2020)) 19103040046_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (7MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The background to the birth of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation is the complexity of business licensing regulations in Indonesia. This complexity is closely correlated with the many government regulations in the licensing sector, leading to overregulation whose substance is not aligned, overlaps and even contradicts one another. Along the way, the creation of the Job Creation Law has sparked controversy among the public. The Job Creation Law is the law that has most often been challenged to the Constitutional Court with the intensity of lawsuits being sued 9 times, until finally the Constitutional Court granted a formal test of the Job Creation Law. Through Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, the Court gave the legislators the opportunity to revise the Job Creation Law for 2 years. This triggers academic payments in which a law that has been declared formally flawed in the process of its formation is actually still in force for 2 years. The purpose of this research is to find out the mechanism for the formation and legal certainty of the Job Creation Law. This study uses the normative legal research method by examining the rule of law theory, the theory of legal certainty and the theory of the formation of laws and regulations (the theory of legislation). The type of research used is library research or library research. The research approach used is juridical-normative. Legislation as the primary material, literature such as books, articles and scientific papers as the secondary material. While dictionaries and encyclopedias are tertiary materials. The results of this study show that the process of forming the Job Creation Law is not in accordance with the mechanism for forming statutory regulations because it has violated the principles of formation and drafting techniques that do not regulate the omnibus law technique as stipulated in Law Number 12 of 2011. In addition, the Copyright Law Work has given rise to legal coercion in many aspects since the formation process, after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, after the revision of Law Number 13 of 2022 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning the Formation of Laws and Regulations invitation Invitation even after the issuance of Perppu Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation.

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item