TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PERMOHONAN PAILIT PT. SUNSHINE INDOGLOBAL YANG DITOLAK OLEH MAJELIS HAKIM (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 17/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2022/PN NIAGA JKT PST)

Kania Syahwa Krisnadi, NIM.: 19103040029 (2023) TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PERMOHONAN PAILIT PT. SUNSHINE INDOGLOBAL YANG DITOLAK OLEH MAJELIS HAKIM (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 17/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2022/PN NIAGA JKT PST). Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

Preview	Text (TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PERMOHONAN PAILIT PT. SUNSHINE INDOGLOBAL YANG DITOLAK OLEH MAJELIS HAKIM (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 17/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2022/PN NIAGA JKT PST)) 19103040029_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (3MB) | Preview
	Text (TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PERMOHONAN PAILIT PT. SUNSHINE INDOGLOBAL YANG DITOLAK OLEH MAJELIS HAKIM (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 17/PDT.SUS-PAILIT/2022/PN NIAGA JKT PST)) 19103040029_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (3MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The thesis entitled “Juridical Review of PT. Sunshine Indoglobal Refused by the Judicial Panel (Study of Decision Number 17/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2022/PN Niaga Jkt Pst)” discusses bankruptcy cases voluntarily submitted by PT. Sunshine Indoglobal to the Commercial Court at the Central Jakarta District Court. PT. Sunshine Indoglobal, a legal entity in the apparel industry business (convection) suffered a loss from the company's revenue which made it in debt with its creditors, namely PT. Uni Kyung Seung International and Mrs. Kim Kyung A as directors who are past due and billable. Nonetheless based on the considerations of the Panel of Judges, the bankruptcy petition filed by PT. Sunshine Indoglobal must be rejected. The main problem in this research is why the bankruptcy application submitted by the applicant in the bankruptcy case decision number 17/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2022/PN Niaga Jkt Pst was rejected by the Panel of Judges and whether the legal considerations carried out by the Panel of Judges in deciding the bankruptcy case number 17/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2022/PN Niaga Jkt Pst are in accordance with Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations. The type of research used in the preparation of this thesis is library research using a normative juridical research approach that is descriptive-analytical in nature by describing in general terms regarding bankruptcy law based on the bankruptcy case decision number 17/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2022/PN Niaga Jkt Pst. then analyzing the issue based on the applicable laws and regulations, namely Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations and related to theories, legal concepts, and positive laws that apply and are related to the decision on bankruptcy applications which was rejected by the trial court. In ruling on this case, the Panel of Judges at the Central Jakarta Commercial Court decided to reject the bankruptcy petition, because the evidence attached to the case could not be proven simply. In this regard, Article 8 paragraph (4) of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Obligations for Payment of Debt cannot be fulfilled. The legal considerations used by the Panel of Judges are in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations, namely referring to Article 2 paragraph (1), Article 3 paragraph (1), Article 7 paragraph (1), and Article 8 paragraph (4) of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations.

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item