ANALISIS YURIDIS KEPEMILIKAN TANAH WARGA NEGARA INDONESIA NONPRIBUMI BERDASARKAN PERJANJIAN PINJAM NAMA ATAU NOMINEE (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI YOGYAKARTA NOMOR 180/PDT.G/2020/PN YYK)

Fiska Raisa Husna, NIM.: 19103040052 (2023) ANALISIS YURIDIS KEPEMILIKAN TANAH WARGA NEGARA INDONESIA NONPRIBUMI BERDASARKAN PERJANJIAN PINJAM NAMA ATAU NOMINEE (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI YOGYAKARTA NOMOR 180/PDT.G/2020/PN YYK). Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

Preview	Text (ANALISIS YURIDIS KEPEMILIKAN TANAH WARGA NEGARA INDONESIA NONPRIBUMI BERDASARKAN PERJANJIAN PINJAM NAMA ATAU NOMINEE (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI YOGYAKARTA NOMOR 180/PDT.G/2020/PN YYK)) 19103040052_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (2MB) | Preview
	Text (ANALISIS YURIDIS KEPEMILIKAN TANAH WARGA NEGARA INDONESIA NONPRIBUMI BERDASARKAN PERJANJIAN PINJAM NAMA ATAU NOMINEE (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI YOGYAKARTA NOMOR 180/PDT.G/2020/PN YYK)) 19103040052_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (3MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

This research discusses the nominee agreement because in the Yogyakarta District Court Decision Number 180/Pdt.G/2020/Pn Yyk namely the Plaintiff was hit by a Circular Letter of the Head of DIY Number K.898/I/A/1975 which states that non-native Indonesian citizens are prohibited register land rights as property rights. Due to a conflict with a regulation, the Plaintiff entered into a nominee agreement with the Defendant in the Property Rights Certificate. The problem is that when the Plaintiff wants to process the transfer of rights to be in his name with land status other than ownership rights, but the Defendant does not want that. This study uses normative research methods with the type of library research to analyze decisions related to loan agreements. In this study, the authors used sources such as Law Number 5 of 1960, Yogyakarta District Court Decision Number 180/Pdt.G/2020/Pn Yyk, books, journals, and theses that discuss loan agreements or nominees. As well as the theoretical framework in the form of the agreement theory, the theory of land ownership, and the theory of realia statute. The results of the study show that the judge's legal considerations in this decision stated that the plaintiff's lawsuit was unacceptable due to a lack of parties as well as a loan agreement or nominee that contradicted the Circular of the Head of DIY Number K.898/I/A/1975 could be considered as smuggling of law and the agreement canceled in the first place or never existed. This means that the practice of borrowing agreements or nominees is not valid and the parties involved in these practices may be subject to legal sanctions.

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item