PERBANDINGAN PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT DALAM PEMBENTUKAN UNDANG-UNDANG (STUDI ANTARA INDONESIA DAN AFRIKA SELATAN)

Syahrul Munawar, NIM.: 19103070059 (2023) PERBANDINGAN PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT DALAM PEMBENTUKAN UNDANG-UNDANG (STUDI ANTARA INDONESIA DAN AFRIKA SELATAN). Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

Preview	Text (PERBANDINGAN PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT DALAM PEMBENTUKAN UNDANG-UNDANG (STUDI ANTARA INDONESIA DAN AFRIKA SELATAN)) 19103070059_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (4MB) | Preview
	Text (PERBANDINGAN PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT DALAM PEMBENTUKAN UNDANG-UNDANG (STUDI ANTARA INDONESIA DAN AFRIKA SELATAN)) 19103070059_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (5MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Laws should not be made one-sidedly or according to personal interests. This violates the principles of democracy, because the law guarantees the interests and justice for all. Indonesia as a democratic country makes the people the holder of state sovereignty, one of the examples is public participation in the making of laws. But until now, there has been no further regulation regarding the facilities and obligations of legislators to involve public participation in the making of laws. This has resulted in lawmakers not having a standardized mechanism that can be used as a reference, so that community involvement is often a formality. South Africa is one of the countries that involves the public in lawmaking. South Africa is a republic with a state institutional structure similar to Indonesia. This research will analyze how public participation in lawmaking in Indonesia and South Africa. Then, a comparison will be made of the two countries which is expected to provide positive input into the concept of public participation in lawmaking in Indonesia. The type of research is classified as normative research with a comparative approach. Meanwhile, the data analysis method used is normative qualitative and the data collection method used is by reviewing laws, books, scientific journals and other sources related to public participation in the formation of laws in Indonesia and South Africa. The theoretical structure in this research includes, comparative law theory, public participation theory and siyasah dusturiyah theory. The results of the research is explain and conclude that public participation in the making of laws both in Indonesia and South Africa are still developing and not optimal. But if using the theory of public participation, South Africa has a higher stage than Indonesia because of the rules and obligations to involve the public in the making of laws. Meanwhile, in Indonesia it is only optional. Therefore, as an effort to strengthen community participation in Indonesia, one of the things that can be adapted from the concept of community participation in South Africa is public hearing activities and implementing a committee proceeding system.

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item