PEMBENTUKAN PERPU PERSPEKTIF QAWA’IDUL FIQHIYYAH: STUDI KASUS PASAL 22 AYAT (1) UUD 1945

Ach Syaifur Rizal, S.H., NIM.: 21203011010 (2023) PEMBENTUKAN PERPU PERSPEKTIF QAWA’IDUL FIQHIYYAH: STUDI KASUS PASAL 22 AYAT (1) UUD 1945. Masters thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

Preview	Text (PARAMETER “IHWAL KEGENTINGAN YANG MEMAKSA” DALAM PEMBENTUKAN PERPU PERSPEKTIF QAWĀ’IDUL FIQHIYYAH: STUDI KASUS PASAL 22 AYAT (1) UUD 1945) 21203011010_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (4MB) | Preview
	Text (PARAMETER “IHWAL KEGENTINGAN YANG MEMAKSA” DALAM PEMBENTUKAN PERPU PERSPEKTIF QAWĀ’IDUL FIQHIYYAH: STUDI KASUS PASAL 22 AYAT (1) UUD 1945) 21203011010_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (6MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Government Regulations in Lieu of Laws (Perpu) are legal instruments used by the President or the government in an emergency or a state of urgency that forces them to address a problem that requires a quick resolution without waiting for the legislative process which takes quite a long time. The formation of a Perpu is regulated in Article 22 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution which reads "in a compelling emergency, the President has the right to issue government regulations in lieu of laws". In the Constitution or other regulations there is no firmness or legal certainty in the phrase "a matter of compelling urgency", so that the use of a Perpu by the President has become a controversial topic in the legal world because it is considered to violate legal principles and has the potential for arbitrariness. President's power. Therefore, the author is interested in examining how the parameters of the phrase "compelling urgency" in Article 22 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution and how the perspective of Qawa>’idul Fiqhiyyah on the formation of Perpu. The research method used is library research, namely analyzing documents and literature studies to collect data, through reading magazines or books related to the Perppu. The theory used to answer this research problem is the theory of legislation formation, the theory of presidential power and the theory of Qawa’idul Fiqhiyyah. The results of this study are, First, that in the author's view there is still no legal certainty in explaining the phrase "compelling urgency" contained in Article 22 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution, as well as in other regulations. Second, according to the perspective of Qawa’idul Fiqhiyyah that the formation of a Perpu made by the President when the country is in a state of critical urgency is permissible to form as long as it is used to save the country, on the basis of a main branch rule which reads “addaruratu tubihul mahdurat” which means that harms can be allow prohibition.

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item