PENETAPAN HAKIM TENTANG PEMBERIAN IZIN PENCATATAN PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA PERSPEKTIF UNDANG-UNDANG PERKAWINAN DAN UNDANG-UNDANG HAK ASASI MANUSIA (STUDI KASUS PENETAPAN PENGADILAN NEGERI SURABAYA NOMOR: 916/PDT.P/2022/PN.SBY.)

Ahmad Busyrol Karim, NIM.: 19103040138 (2024) PENETAPAN HAKIM TENTANG PEMBERIAN IZIN PENCATATAN PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA PERSPEKTIF UNDANG-UNDANG PERKAWINAN DAN UNDANG-UNDANG HAK ASASI MANUSIA (STUDI KASUS PENETAPAN PENGADILAN NEGERI SURABAYA NOMOR: 916/PDT.P/2022/PN.SBY.). Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

Preview	Text (PENETAPAN HAKIM TENTANG PEMBERIAN IZIN PENCATATAN PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA PERSPEKTIF UNDANG-UNDANG PERKAWINAN DAN UNDANG-UNDANG HAK ASASI MANUSIA (STUDI KASUS PENETAPAN PENGADILAN NEGERI SURABAYA NOMOR: 916/PDT.P/2022/PN.SBY.)) 19103040138_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (3MB) | Preview
	Text (PENETAPAN HAKIM TENTANG PEMBERIAN IZIN PENCATATAN PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA PERSPEKTIF UNDANG-UNDANG PERKAWINAN DAN UNDANG-UNDANG HAK ASASI MANUSIA (STUDI KASUS PENETAPAN PENGADILAN NEGERI SURABAYA NOMOR: 916/PDT.P/2022/PN.SBY.)) 19103040138_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (3MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The granting of interfaith marriage registration permits is rife in district courts, while the granting of interfaith marriage registration permits is very controversial, with one example of a case in the granting of interfaith marriage registration permits at the Surabaya District Court with Number: 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN. Sby. Therefore, my research raised two problem formulations including; 1) how is the legal consideration by the judge in granting permission to register interfaith marriages in the Surabaya District Court Determination Number: 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN. Sby? 2) How the Surabaya District Court Decree Number: 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN. Sby reviewed from the Marriage Law and Human Rights Law? This research is library research, which is research whose data uses laws, books, journals and information media related to research and has relevance about interfaith marriage. The primary data source used in this study was sourced from the Surabaya District Court Determination Number: 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN. Sby, Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights, Law Number 23 of 2006 concerning Population Administration, Government Regulation Number 9 of 1975 concerning the Implementation of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, Compilation of Islamic Law, Fatwa MUI. The analytical technique in this study uses Descriptive-Analysis techniques with a Juridical-Normative approach. The study concluded as follows; 1) The judge uses legal considerations in the Surabaya District Court Decision Number: 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN. Sby is Article 8 letter (f) of the Marriage Law, Article 35 letter (a) of the Population Administration Law, and Article 10 paragraph (3) of the 1975 PP concerning the implementation of the Marriage Law. The Judge also considered the human rights of the Petitioners using Article 29 of the 1945 Constitution and Article 28B of the Second Amendment of the 1945 Constitution. 2) a) Judging from the Marriage Law, the legal considerations used by judges using Article 8 letter (f) are inappropriate, because the explanation in the article explains that marriage is prohibited if in religion it is prohibited. b) Judging from the Human Rights Law, Article 10 explains that a marriage is valid if it is in accordance with the provisions of the applicable laws and regulations, in this case Article 2 of the Marriage Law. So that the matter of legalizing marriage must refer to Article 2 of the Marriage Law.

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item