DISPARITAS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENETAPKAN HAK ASUH ANAK YANG BELUM MUMAYIZ (STUDI PERBANDINGAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA YOGYAKARTA NOMOR 348/PDT.G/2021/PA.YK DAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA JEPARA NOMOR 1492/PDT.G/2021/PA.JEPR)

Nur Fauziyah Laili, NIM.: 20103050031 (2024) DISPARITAS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENETAPKAN HAK ASUH ANAK YANG BELUM MUMAYIZ (STUDI PERBANDINGAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA YOGYAKARTA NOMOR 348/PDT.G/2021/PA.YK DAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA JEPARA NOMOR 1492/PDT.G/2021/PA.JEPR). Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

Preview	Text (DISPARITAS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENETAPKAN HAK ASUH ANAK YANG BELUM MUMAYIZ (STUDI PERBANDINGAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA YOGYAKARTA NOMOR 348/PDT.G/2021/PA.YK DAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA JEPARA NOMOR 1492/PDT.G/2021/PA.JEPR)) 20103050031_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (4MB) | Preview
	Text (DISPARITAS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENETAPKAN HAK ASUH ANAK YANG BELUM MUMAYIZ (STUDI PERBANDINGAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA YOGYAKARTA NOMOR 348/PDT.G/2021/PA.YK DAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA JEPARA NOMOR 1492/PDT.G/2021/PA.JEPR)) 20103050031_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (3MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

This research explores the disparities in judges' decisions regarding the custody of non-mature children, particularly in the Religious Court Decision of Yogyakarta Number 348/Pdt.G/2021/PA.YK and the Religious Court Decision of Jepara Number 1492/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Jepr. The core issue of this research lies in the reasons and legal basis that serve as considerations for the judges in the disparities between these two decisions, followed by an examination of the alignment of these considerations with the perspective of maqashid asy-syari’ah, and the judges' considerations regarding post-decision continuity. The objective of this research is to gain a deeper understanding of the factors influencing the disparities in judges' decisions, provide a foundational legal insight, and analyze the judges' considerations through the lens of maqashid asy-syari’ah, ensuring alignment with the principles of Islamic law and maximum protection of the interests of the child, as well as understanding the judges' follow-up actions after the decision. This research uses a normative juridical approach with a document study type of research supported by interviews, focusing on the analysis of the Yogyakarta Religious Court Decision Number 348/Pdt.G/2021/PA.YK and the Jepara Religious Court Decision Number 1492/Pdt.G/2021/PA .Jepr. This research is based on four theoretical frameworks, namely legal realism, maqashid asy-syari'ah, legal interpretation, and judge's considerations. The research results show that the Jepara Religious Court Decision Number 1492/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Jepr is based on the theory of legal realism, prioritizing real factors and the best interests of the child even though it conflicts with existing statutory provisions. In contrast, the Yogyakarta Religious Court Decision Number 348/Pdt.G/2021/PA.YK considers the law contextually and prioritizes the best interests of children, creating a balance between normative and factual. Overall, the Jepara Religious Court Decision Number 1492/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Jepr and the Yogyakarta Religious Court Decision Number 348/Pdt.G/2021/PA.YK succeeded in integrating the principles of maqashid asy-syari'ah, creating a decision which is in line with the maintenance of religion, soul, mind, property and offspring and is of course based on the best interests of the child.

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item