REINTEGRASI SOSIAL TERHADAP RESIDIVIS PENCURIAN DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN KELAS II A YOGYAKARTA

Uffi Novitasari, NIM.: 20103040130 (2024) REINTEGRASI SOSIAL TERHADAP RESIDIVIS PENCURIAN DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN KELAS II A YOGYAKARTA. Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

Preview	Text (REINTEGRASI SOSIAL TERHADAP RESIDIVIS PENCURIAN DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN KELAS II A YOGYAKARTA) 20103040130_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (3MB) | Preview
	Text (REINTEGRASI SOSIAL TERHADAP RESIDIVIS PENCURIAN DI LEMBAGA PEMASYARAKATAN KELAS II A YOGYAKARTA) 20103040130_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (5MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

This research departs from the efforts of the purpose of punishment which is recovery by creating social reintegration which is a form of correctional system based on Law Number 22 of 2022 which aims to improve the quality of personality and independence of prisoners so that they realize their mistakes, make self-improvement, and do not repeat criminal acts so that they can be accepted back in society properly, can live reasonably as they were before committing a crime. However, in practice the level of recidivism continues to increase, especially in theft recidivists. With the recidivism cases, especially theft recidivists that have the potential to be many and widespread, it is necessary to review how to provide social reintegration in Correctional Institutions and Correctional Centers for theft recidivists. Based on this background, the main problems arise First, How is the process of social reintegration of theft recidivists in Class II A Correctional Institution Yogyakarta and in Class I Correctional Center Yogyakarta. Second, What factors influence the process of social reintegration of theft recidivists in Class II A Correctional Institution Yogyakarta and in Class I Correctional Center Yogyakarta. As for answering the main problem, the author uses legal penology theory, coaching theory and correctional theory. This research uses empirical legal research methods with a juridical-empirical approach. The data collection technique uses the observation method, interviews conducted with several Correctional Facility officers, several Correctional Counselors (PK), Correctional Clients and the Community or RT / RW where the client lives, and uses the documentation method. While data analysis uses qualitative descriptive methods. This study shows that the process of social reintegration of theft recidivists both for prisoners who are in prisons and Correctional Clients who are in Bapas can be said to be effective. Coaching and mentoring of theft recidivists at these institutions is not differentiated in terms of coaching for each crime. The two institutions have their own differences in terms of reintegration. At the Correctional Institution Class II A Yogyakarta, the difference in coaching theft recidivists with other recidivists lies in legal awareness education. While in the Correctional Center Class I Yogyakarta the difference lies in the treatment of counseling services. The factors that influence the process of social reintegration in the two institutions consist of inhibiting factors and supporting factors. And the main factor that makes someone a theft recidivist is economic factors.

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item