A PRAGMA-DIALECTICAL STUDY OF SPEECH ACT AND ARGUMENTATIVE INDICATOR IN OXFORD UNION DEBATE IS ISLAM A PEACEFUL RELIGION (2013)

Kaulya Elfina Larasati, NIM.: 19101050081 (2023) A PRAGMA-DIALECTICAL STUDY OF SPEECH ACT AND ARGUMENTATIVE INDICATOR IN OXFORD UNION DEBATE IS ISLAM A PEACEFUL RELIGION (2013). Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

Preview	Text (A PRAGMA-DIALECTICAL STUDY OF SPEECH ACT AND ARGUMENTATIVE INDICATOR IN OXFORD UNION DEBATE IS ISLAM A PEACEFUL RELIGION (2013)) 19101050081_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (716kB) | Preview
	Text (A PRAGMA-DIALECTICAL STUDY OF SPEECH ACT AND ARGUMENTATIVE INDICATOR IN OXFORD UNION DEBATE IS ISLAM A PEACEFUL RELIGION (2013)) 19101050081_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (410kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

This research aims to find speech acts and the argumentative indicators performed and used by the positive side and the negative side along with its function in their speech in Oxford Union debate Is Islam a peaceful religion? (2013) using pragma-dialectical approach of argumentation theory developed by Van Eemeren and Grootendorst. This study uses descriptive qualitative method. The result shows the most frequent of speech act performed and argumentative indicator used by both parties to introduce their speech acts in each stage of critical discussion. The positive side in the confrontation stage mostly performs assertive to express standpoint by introducing PAI and FME, in the opening stage mostly performs commissive to accept the burden of proof by introducing indicator of acceptance the challenge to defend standpoint, in the argumentation stage mostly performs assertive to advance argument by introducing analogy argumentation indicator and coordinative argumentation indicator, in the concluding stage mostly performs assertive to maintain standpoint and commissive to repeat unacceptance of standpoint by introducing argumentative indicator of maintaining initial standpoint. While the most frequent of speech act performed by the negative side in the confrontation stage is assertive to express standpoint by introducing PAI and FME. In the opening stage are commissive to accept the burden of proof and directive to challenge the burden of proof by introducing the argumentative indicator of it, in the argumentation stage is assertive to advance argument by introducing symptomatic argumentation indicator and coordinative argumentation indicator, in the concluding stage are assertive to maintain standpoint by introducing argumentative indicator of maintaining initial standpoint and commissive to repeat unacceptance of standpoint.

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item