TINJAUAN YURIDIS WANPRESTASI NON-COMPETITION CLAUSE DALAM PERJANJIAN WARALABA PADA PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI YOGYAKARTA NOMOR 65/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Yyk

Anas Ariman Latip, NIM.: 19103040097 (2024) TINJAUAN YURIDIS WANPRESTASI NON-COMPETITION CLAUSE DALAM PERJANJIAN WARALABA PADA PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI YOGYAKARTA NOMOR 65/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Yyk. Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

	Text (TINJAUAN YURIDIS WANPRESTASI NON-COMPETITION CLAUSE DALAM PERJANJIAN WARALABA PADA PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI YOGYAKARTA NOMOR 65/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Yyk) 19103040097_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (3MB)
	Text (TINJAUAN YURIDIS WANPRESTASI NON-COMPETITION CLAUSE DALAM PERJANJIAN WARALABA PADA PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI YOGYAKARTA NOMOR 65/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Yyk) 19103040097_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (4MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

A franchise agreement is an obligation that arises from an agreement as regulated in Book III of the Civil Code. Franchise agreements in Indonesia are regulated by Government Regulation no. 42 of 2007 concerning Franchising, Law Number 20 of 2008 concerning Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises and Minister of Trade Regulation No. 71 of 2019 concerning the Implementation of Franchises. The purpose of this research is to determine the non-competition clause default in the franchise agreement in the Yogyakarta District Court decision Number 65/Pdgt.G/PN.Yyk and to determine the legal consequences for the parties of the Yogyakarta District Court decision Number 65/Pdt.G/PN.Yyk. In this thesis research, a normative juridical approach is used, so that what is studied is the problems in the research through an approach to legal norms contained in existing laws and regulations in Indonesia, and field research as supporting material by conducting interviews with Yogyakarta District Court Judges. The reseach result that the default on the non-competition clause in the Melia Laundry & Drycleaning Franchise Agreement by the Franchisee can be held responsible by the Franchisor and does not conflict with Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition this is in line with the principle of pacta sunt servanda. Meanwhile, the legal consequence of the Yogyakarta District Court Decision Number 65/Pdt.G/PN.Yyk for the parties is the birth of a peace deed, where the peace deed states that the Defendant as a result of the mediation is required to pay Rp. 150,000,000 (one hundred and fifty million rupiah) to the Plaintiff as compensation for violations of Article 16.6, Article 16.7 and Article 16.8 regarding the non-competition clause in the Melia Unit Laundry & Drycleaning Workshop Franchise Agreement.

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item