HUKUM MENGUCAPKAN SELAMAT HARI RAYA KEPADA NON-MUSLIM (STUDI FATWA AL-LAJNAH AD-DAIMAH ARAB SAUDI DAN DAR AL-IFTA’ MESIR)

Fazlur Rahman, NIM.: 21103060042 (2025) HUKUM MENGUCAPKAN SELAMAT HARI RAYA KEPADA NON-MUSLIM (STUDI FATWA AL-LAJNAH AD-DAIMAH ARAB SAUDI DAN DAR AL-IFTA’ MESIR). Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

Preview	Text (HUKUM MENGUCAPKAN SELAMAT HARI RAYA KEPADA NON-MUSLIM (STUDI FATWA AL-LAJNAH AD-DAIMAH ARAB SAUDI DAN DAR AL-IFTA’ MESIR)) 21103060042_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (11MB) | Preview
	Text (HUKUM MENGUCAPKAN SELAMAT HARI RAYA KEPADA NON-MUSLIM (STUDI FATWA AL-LAJNAH AD-DAIMAH ARAB SAUDI DAN DAR AL-IFTA’ MESIR)) 21103060042_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (16MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The ruling on wishing non-Muslims a happy holiday has been debated by scholars. The concept of religious moderation and the values of tolerance in a plural society are the dominant discourses today that require a reading of the law of congratulating non-Muslims. Fatwas related to the law have emerged from various regions and countries. Among them are Al-Lajnah Ad-Daimah and Dar Al-Ifta'. If the first fatwa institution comes from a country with a textualist application of Islamic law (Saudi Arabia), then it is different from the second fatwa institution. Dar Al-Ifta' is an Egyptian fatwa institution, one of the moderate countries in applying Islamic law. The fundamental question of this research is how the law of wishing happy holidays to non-Muslims is studied by the two fatwa institutions. This type of research is qualitative with data sourced from library research. The data of this research are obtained from the fatwas of Al-Lajnah Ad-Daimah and Dar Al-Ifta' as primary data and supporting data from various literatures relevant to this topic. Furthermore, the fatwas of both are analyzed using the framework of negotiative hermeneutics theory. This theory was initiated by Khaled Abou El Fadl who emphasized the negotiation between three entities, including the author, text, and reader. There are three key variables in studying the fatwa of Al-Lajnah Ad-Daimah and Dar Al-Ifta'. Starting from text and authority, the construction of authoritarianism, to the anatomy of authoritarian discourse. Based on this, this research uses a socio-legal approach. First, the conclusion obtained is that these two fatwa institutions have a considerable gap in fatwa differences. Second, there are three key variables used when analyzed using negotiative hermeneutics theory. In text and authority, it can be seen how these two fatwa institutions have authority in discussing this topic. At the same time, the differences in the social reality of their audiences also affect the differences in methods and rulings. In the construction of authoritarianism, it can be seen that the determination of the law is not authoritarian from the fulfillment of the five prerequisites proposed by negotiative hermeneutics. Both have differences in fulfilling these five prerequisites. Then, in the anatomy of authoritarian discourse, three things are studied: consistency, selective attitude in sorting out arguments, and balancing various interests and rationales. Both fatwa organizations consistently use their own methods in studying this topic. Al-Lajnah Ad-Daimah is selective in sorting out arguments, in contrast to Dar Al-Ifta' which explores more arguments. Finally, in balancing various interests, Al-Lajnah Ad-Daimah is only concerned with preserving religion. While Dar Al-Ifta' combines two interests: protecting religion and upholding the values of tolerance

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item