TINJAUAN YURIDIS MENGENAI STATUS HUKUM BASYARNAS SEBAGAI LEMBAGA ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA SEKTOR KEUANGAN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 4 TAHUN 2023

Bunga Annisa, S.H., NIM.: 23203011222 (2025) TINJAUAN YURIDIS MENGENAI STATUS HUKUM BASYARNAS SEBAGAI LEMBAGA ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA SEKTOR KEUANGAN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 4 TAHUN 2023. Masters thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

Preview	Text (TINJAUAN YURIDIS MENGENAI STATUS HUKUM BASYARNAS SEBAGAI LEMBAGA ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA SEKTOR KEUANGAN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 4 TAHUN 2023) 23203011222_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (9MB) | Preview
	Text (TINJAUAN YURIDIS MENGENAI STATUS HUKUM BASYARNAS SEBAGAI LEMBAGA ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA SEKTOR KEUANGAN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 4 TAHUN 2023) 23203011222_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (23MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The National Sharia Arbitration Board (BASYARNAS) serves as a non-litigation dispute resolution institution based on sharia principles. Its presence offers an alternative dispute resolution mechanism that is efficient, fair, and aligned with Islamic values. However, the enactment of Law Number 4 of 2023 concerning the Development and Strengthening of the Financial Sector, along with OJK Regulation Number 61 of 2020, has reshaped the landscape of dispute resolution in the financial sector. These regulations stipulate that non-judicial dispute resolution may only be conducted by institutions approved by the Financial Services Authority (OJK). Since BASYARNAS is not registered as a Financial Services Sector Dispute Resolution Institution (LAPS-SJK), its legal standing and legitimacy in resolving sharia financial disputes have weakened. This study employs a juridical-empirical approach using a descriptive qualitative method. Primary data were collected through interviews with BASYARNAS arbitrators and staff, while secondary data were obtained from regulations and academic literature. The analysis focuses on the legal implications of regulatory changes on the status and function of BASYARNAS. The findings indicate that the new regulations significantly limit BASYARNAS’s role and reduce options for sharia-based dispute resolution. This contradicts the principle of maslahah, as it hampers access to justice aligned with Islamic values. Therefore, legal reconstruction is needed to formally recognize BASYARNAS within the national legal system, ensuring its relevance and authority in resolving Islamic financial disputes.

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item