CRYPTOCURRENCY SEBAGAI OBJEK KEWARISAN (ANALISIS PANDANGAN MUI KOTA YOGYAKARTA DAN KOMUNITAS AKADEMI CRYPTO YOGYAKARTA)

Muhammad Yahya Khoirul Anwar, NIM.: 21103050122 (2025) CRYPTOCURRENCY SEBAGAI OBJEK KEWARISAN (ANALISIS PANDANGAN MUI KOTA YOGYAKARTA DAN KOMUNITAS AKADEMI CRYPTO YOGYAKARTA). Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

Preview	Text (CRYPTOCURRENCY SEBAGAI OBJEK KEWARISAN (ANALISIS PANDANGAN MUI KOTA YOGYAKARTA DAN KOMUNITAS AKADEMI CRYPTO YOGYAKARTA)) 21103050122_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (8MB) | Preview
	Text (CRYPTOCURRENCY SEBAGAI OBJEK KEWARISAN (ANALISIS PANDANGAN MUI KOTA YOGYAKARTA DAN KOMUNITAS AKADEMI CRYPTO YOGYAKARTA)) 21103050122_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (11MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The advancement of digital technology has driven a major transformation in the global financial transaction system. One of the most prominent innovations is the emergence of cryptocurrency, a digital currency based on blockchain technology. This technology enables secure, transparent, and globally distributed transaction records without the need for a central authority such as a bank. In Indonesia, interest in cryptocurrency continues to grow, both as an investment tool and as an alternative digital payment method. However, its legal status remains a subject of debate. On one hand, the government, through the Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency (Bappebti), has regulated crypto asset trading as a legally recognized commodity in physical markets. On the other hand, the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) has issued a fatwa declaring cryptocurrency as haram (forbidden) due to its speculative nature, high volatility, and lack of tangible asset backing or stable value. This study seeks to explore and analyze the perspectives of MUI Kota Yogyakarta and the Crypto Academic Community of Yogyakarta regarding the validity of cryptocurrency as an object of inheritance from both Islamic legal and Indonesian regulatory perspectives. The research employs Karl Mannheim's sociology of knowledge approach, which explains that perspectives on cryptocurrency are shaped by social structures, personal experiences, and institutional positions and interests. In addition, Gustav Radbruch’s legal certainty theory is used, emphasizing the importance of justice, utility, and legal clarity in formulating policies that are acceptable to society. The findings reveal that although MUI tends to take a conservative stance by rejecting cryptocurrency as an inheritable asset due to its failure to meet the criteria of maal (Islamic wealth), the crypto academic community advocates for a more open and progressive understanding. Thus, this research not only highlights the contrasting approaches between religious institutions and the tech community but also offers an alternative discourse suggesting that the existence of cryptocurrency within Islamic inheritance and legal systems can be reevaluated more comprehensively, provided it adheres to the principles of justice, legal certainty, and public benefit (maslahah). The study is expected to contribute to the development of digital asset regulations that are not only legally valid but also aligned with the ethical and religious norms of Indonesian society

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item