PENAFSIRAN KEBIJAKAN HUKUM TERBUKA (OPEN LEGAL POLICY) TENTANG PERPANJANGAN MASA JABATAN PIMPINAN KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI

Davina Malvaputri Mayadita Subronto, NIM.: 21103070041 (2025) PENAFSIRAN KEBIJAKAN HUKUM TERBUKA (OPEN LEGAL POLICY) TENTANG PERPANJANGAN MASA JABATAN PIMPINAN KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI. Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

Preview	Text (PENAFSIRAN KEBIJAKAN HUKUMTERBUKA (OPEN LEGAL POLICY) TENTANG PERPANJANGAN MASA JABATAN PIMPINAN KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI) 21103070041_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (9MB) | Preview
	Text (PENAFSIRAN KEBIJAKAN HUKUMTERBUKA (OPEN LEGAL POLICY) TENTANG PERPANJANGAN MASA JABATAN PIMPINAN KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI) 21103070041_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (7MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The Constitutional Court Decision Number 112/PUU-XX/2022, which extended the term of office of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) leadership from four to five years, has sparked significant public and academic debate. The issue arises from concerns over the misuse of the open legal policy doctrine, which allows the Constitutional Court to intrude into the legislative domain. This research is guided by two main questions: How does the Constitutional Court interpret open legal policy in Decision Number 112/PUUXX/ 2022 and How is this interpretation viewed from the perspective of fiqh siyasah tasyri’iyyah. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory and case approach. Data were collected through library research of laws, books, journals, and relevant legal documents. The research is descriptive-analytical and focuses on normative analysis of the Constitutional Court’s decision and its relevance to Islamic legal principles from the siyasah tasyri’iyyah perspective. The findings show that the Constitutional Court has expanded the interpretation of open legal policy beyond its legitimate authority as a negative legislator. This blurs the line between legislative and judicial functions and creates a potential conflict of interest, especially since the decision benefits the current KPK leadership. A literature review of various journals and dissertations supports these concerns, highlighting similar critiques in previous rulings. Therefore, stricter limitations and constitutional parameters are needed to prevent the misuse of open legal policy in judicial reviews, ensuring compliance with the rule of law and democratic governance.

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item