PEMBERHENTIAN HAKIM KONSTITUSI OLEH DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT DAN DAMPAKNYA PADA INDEPENDENSI KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN PERSPEKTIF SIYASAH QADHAIYYAH

Utik Ayu Andanawarih, NIM.: 20103070020 (2025) PEMBERHENTIAN HAKIM KONSTITUSI OLEH DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT DAN DAMPAKNYA PADA INDEPENDENSI KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN PERSPEKTIF SIYASAH QADHAIYYAH. Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

Preview	Text (PEMBERHENTIAN HAKIM KONSTITUSI OLEH DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT DAN DAMPAKNYA PADA INDEPENDENSI KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN PERSPEKTIF SIYASAH QADHAIYYAH) 20103070020_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (9MB) | Preview
	Text (PEMBERHENTIAN HAKIM KONSTITUSI OLEH DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT DAN DAMPAKNYA PADA INDEPENDENSI KEKUASAAN KEHAKIMAN PERSPEKTIF SIYASAH QADHAIYYAH) 20103070020_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (10MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The Dismissal of a Constitutional Court Justice by the House of Representatives (DPR) outside constitutional provisions has sparked controversy regarding the independence of judicial power in Indonesia. One particular case highlights the dismissal of Constitutional Justice Aswanto by the DPR before the end of his term, without following the procedures stipulated in the Constitutional Court Law. This phenomenon raises crucial questions about whether such an action constitutes a violation of the principle of judicial independence and how it should be viewed from the perspective of siyasah qadhaiyyah, an Islamic political-judicial concept that emphasizes justice, independence, and the freedom of judges from interference by other branches of power. Therefore, this study aims to examine the legal basis for the dismissal of constitutional justices by the DPR and its impact on the independence of judicial power from the perspective of siyasah qadhaiyyah. This research employs a normative-juridical method using library research. It adopts a statutory approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The data consist of primary legal materials such as the 1945 Constitution, the Constitutional Court Law, and Constitutional Court decisions, complemented by secondary legal materials including Islamic legal literature, journals, and academic articles. The analysis technique is conducted qualitatively using a deductive approach to examine the prevailing legal norms and their relevance to the principle of siyasah qadhaiyyah (legality) within the context of Indonesia’s constitutional system. The results of the study show that the dismissal of a constitutional justice by the DPR without a legitimate legal basis such as a violation of the code of ethics, a criminal offense, or voluntary resignation contradicts the principle of legality and judicial independence. From the perspective of siyasah qadhaiyyah, this action violates the values of justice and undermines the integrity of the judiciary, which ought to be free from legislative influence. Furthermore, the DPR’s actions set a negative precedent that threatens the independence of judges in carrying out their judicial duties. Therefore, strengthening protection mechanisms for constitutional justices is necessary to uphold the principle of judicial independence, both within the framework of Indonesia’s positive law and according to the principles of Islamic legal thought.

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item