ANALISIS PUTUSAN CERAI TALAK PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL (PNS) TANPA SURAT IZIN ATASAN (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA SLEMAN NO.1233/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Smn)

Moh. Ahda Maulana Matondang, NIM.: 19103050082 (2025) ANALISIS PUTUSAN CERAI TALAK PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL (PNS) TANPA SURAT IZIN ATASAN (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA SLEMAN NO.1233/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Smn). Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

Preview	Text (ANALISIS PUTUSAN CERAI TALAK PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL (PNS) TANPA SURAT IZIN ATASAN (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA SLEMAN NO.1233/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Smn)) 19103050082_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (9MB) | Preview
	Text (ANALISIS PUTUSAN CERAI TALAK PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL (PNS) TANPA SURAT IZIN ATASAN (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN AGAMA SLEMAN NO.1233/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Smn)) 19103050082_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (7MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Divorce filed by a Civil Servant (PNS) is required to obtain prior authorization from a competent official, as stipulated in Article 3 of Government Regulation No. 10 of 1983 concerning Marriage and Divorce Permits for Civil Servants in conjunction with Article 1 of Government Regulation No. 45 of 1990 concerning Marriage and Divorce Permits for Civil Servants. This research analyzes the legal framework and the Maqasid al-Shariah perspective on Decision Number 1233/Pdt.G/2021/PA.Smn, which granted a divorce petition (cerai talak) filed by a Civil Servant without obtaining authorization from his superior. The study aims to examine the judges’ legal considerations and assess the conformity of the decision with Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage, the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), and the principles of Maqasid al-Shariah. This research applies a normative juridical method with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. Data were collected through library research, focusing on primary legal sources such as court rulings, relevant legislation, and Islamic legal literature. The analysis was conducted qualitatively to assess the alignment between the court’s decision, statutory norms, and the principles of public benefit (maslahah). The findings show that the court granted the petition based on valid legal grounds for divorce as stipulated in Article 19 of Government Regulation No. 9 of 1975 and Article 116 of the Compilation of Islamic Law, despite the petitioner’s administrative violation of Government Regulation No. 10 of 1983 jo. No. 45 of 1990. From the Maqasid al-Shariah perspective, the ruling aligns with the objectives of preserving religion (hifz al-din), life (hifz al-nafs), and dignity (hifz al-‘ird), serving the greater public interest by preventing prolonged domestic harm. The study recommends harmonizing administrative and religious legal frameworks to ensure that divorce rulings involving civil servants uphold bureaucratic discipline while maintaining the principle of maslahah.

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item