IMPLIKASI HUKUM TERHADAP PENCATATAN PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA PASCA SEMA NO. 2 TAHUN 2023 STUDI KASUS PENETAPAN NO. 423/Pdt.P/2023/PN Jkt.Utr

Mellisa Puput Sabrina, NIM.: 21103040030 (2025) IMPLIKASI HUKUM TERHADAP PENCATATAN PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA PASCA SEMA NO. 2 TAHUN 2023 STUDI KASUS PENETAPAN NO. 423/Pdt.P/2023/PN Jkt.Utr. Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

Preview	Text (IMPLIKASI HUKUM TERHADAP PENCATATAN PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA PASCA SEMA NO. 2 TAHUN 2023 STUDI KASUS PENETAPAN NO. 423/Pdt.P/2023/PN Jkt.Utr) 21103040030_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (10MB) | Preview
	Text (IMPLIKASI HUKUM TERHADAP PENCATATAN PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA PASCA SEMA NO. 2 TAHUN 2023 STUDI KASUS PENETAPAN NO. 423/Pdt.P/2023/PN Jkt.Utr) 21103040030_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (10MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Interfaith marriage is still a hotly discussed issue in Indonesia due to the lack of legal certainty and the absence of clear regulations in Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage. To provide clearer guidelines for the judiciary in handling such cases, the Supreme Court issued Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) No. 2 of 2023 which emphasizes the prohibition for District Court judges to grant applications for registration of interfaith marriages. However, after the issuance of the SEMA, the North Jakarta District Court still granted the application for registration of interfaith marriages in Determination Number 423/Pdt.P/2023/PN Jkt.Utr. This situation raises questions regarding the judge's basis for considering the ruling, its compliance with Indonesian positive law, and how the judge should determine similar requests in the future. This research uses a normative juridical research method with analytical descriptive research specifications. The research data was obtained through a literature study which included primary legal materials such as statutory regulations, Supreme Court Circulars, and court decisions, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of legal books and journals. Data analysis was carried out qualitatively by interpreting legal provisions relevant to the problems studied. The results of the study show that the panel of judges in granting Decision Number 423/Pdt.P/2023/PN Jkt.Utr referred to the legal basis in the form of articles in statutory regulations, but had not yet applied the judicial guidelines as regulated in SEMA No. 2 of 2023. In his considerations, the judge considered that Catholics and Protestant Christians were of the same faith so it was not considered an interfaith marriage. This decision creates a discrepancy with the Supreme Court guidelines and has implications for weakening legal certainty in judicial practice in Indonesia.

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item