SIFAT POSITIVE LEGISLATURE PADA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TENTANG AMBANG BATAS PENCALONAN KEPALA DAERAH

Nabilla Syifa Auliya, NIM.: 22103070003 (2026) SIFAT POSITIVE LEGISLATURE PADA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TENTANG AMBANG BATAS PENCALONAN KEPALA DAERAH. Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

Preview	Text (SIFAT POSITIVE LEGISLATURE PADA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TENTANG AMBANG BATAS PENCALONAN KEPALA DAERAH) 22103070003_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (9MB) | Preview
	Text (SIFAT POSITIVE LEGISLATURE PADA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TENTANG AMBANG BATAS PENCALONAN KEPALA DAERAH) 22103070003_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (11MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The Constitutional Court's paradigm shift from negative legislature to positive legislature has sparked debate regarding the limits of judges' authority in deciding cases, especially when the decision contains new regulatory norms. This study aims to examine in depth the urgency of the nature of positive legislator in the perspective of judicial activism and its relevance to the principles of justice and benefit contained in the theory of siyasah qadhaiyyah. The analysis is conducted to assess the extent to which the MK acts as a positive legislator in deciding a case. This study examines the expansion of the Constitutional Court's decisions through the perspectives of judicial activism and siyasah qadhaiyyah to assess their conformity with the constitution and the goal of public welfare. This study uses a normative juridical method with a descriptive-analytical and approaches, namely the legislation approach, the conceptual approach, and the case approach. The theories used as analytical tools are the theory of judicial activism, the theory of trias politica, and the theory of siyasah qadhaiyyah. The results of the study show that the positive decision of the legislator in this case, when viewed from the perspective of judicial activism, is in line with the 1945 Constitution because it aims to protect the rights of citizens and prevent legal vacuums. In terms of siyasah qadhaiyyah, this step is ijtihad qadha'i which prioritizes the principles of maqashid al-syari'ah (justice, benefit, and equality). Therefore, this ruling contributes positively to the creation of a healthier democracy.

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item