PERSPEKTIF HUKUM HAKIM TERHADAP MEKANISME PEMBUKTIAN KERUGIAN IMMATERIIL DALAM KONTEKS KEBOCORAN DATA PRIBADI (STUDI PENGADILAN NEGERI YOGYAKARTA)

Ade Fitriani Harahap, NIM.: 22103040025 (2026) PERSPEKTIF HUKUM HAKIM TERHADAP MEKANISME PEMBUKTIAN KERUGIAN IMMATERIIL DALAM KONTEKS KEBOCORAN DATA PRIBADI (STUDI PENGADILAN NEGERI YOGYAKARTA). Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

	Text (PERSPEKTIF HUKUM HAKIM TERHADAP MEKANISME PEMBUKTIAN KERUGIAN IMMATERIIL DALAM KONTEKS KEBOCORAN DATA PRIBADI (STUDI PENGADILAN NEGERI YOGYAKARTA)) 22103040025_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (8MB)
	Text (PERSPEKTIF HUKUM HAKIM TERHADAP MEKANISME PEMBUKTIAN KERUGIAN IMMATERIIL DALAM KONTEKS KEBOCORAN DATA PRIBADI (STUDI PENGADILAN NEGERI YOGYAKARTA)) 22103040025_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (16MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The increase in cases of personal data leaks in Indonesia highlights a serious problem in the protection of citizens' privacy rights. Throughout 2022-2024, personal data leaks, such as population and banking data, not only caused material losses but also had an impact on individuals' sense of security, dignity and privacy rights. However, in judicial practice, proving immaterial losses faces obstacles due to their abstract nature and the absence of clear parameters or assessment standards, making it difficult to prove objectively in court. This study aims to analyse the mechanism of proving immaterial losses in personal data leak disputes, particularly Article 64 of the PDP Law, and to examine the legal perspective of judges in assessing the proof of such immaterial losses. This research is a juridical-empirical legal study with a qualitative approach and a descriptive-analytical model, conducted through in-depth interviews with judges at the Yogyakarta District Court and a literature review. The results of the study indicate that judges at the Yogyakarta District Court are cautious in applying high standards of proof to claims for immaterial damages. Judges generally grant compensation that can be proven based on the facts of the trial, so in practice, claims for immaterial damages tend not to be granted. Although this cautious approach aims to maintain the objectivity of the verdict, the absence of parameters for proving immaterial damages has the potential to hinder the protection of data subjects' rights.

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item