IMPLIKASI YURIDIS PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM PENERAPAN PASAL 44 KUHP TERHADAP PELAKU PEMBUNUHAN PENGIDAP SKIZOFRENIA PARANOID (STUDI KOMPARATIF PUTUSAN NOMOR 10/PID.B/2019/PN KPH DAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 150/PID.B/2024/PN JKT.BRT)

Nimas Adifa, NIM.: 22103060004 (2026) IMPLIKASI YURIDIS PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM PENERAPAN PASAL 44 KUHP TERHADAP PELAKU PEMBUNUHAN PENGIDAP SKIZOFRENIA PARANOID (STUDI KOMPARATIF PUTUSAN NOMOR 10/PID.B/2019/PN KPH DAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 150/PID.B/2024/PN JKT.BRT). Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

	Text (IMPLIKASI YURIDIS PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM PENERAPAN PASAL 44 KUHP TERHADAP PELAKU PEMBUNUHAN PENGIDAP SKIZOFRENIA PARANOID (STUDI KOMPARATIF PUTUSAN NOMOR 10/PID.B/2019/PN KPH DAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 150/PID.B/2024/PN JKT.BRT)) 22103060004_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (3MB)
	Text (IMPLIKASI YURIDIS PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM PENERAPAN PASAL 44 KUHP TERHADAP PELAKU PEMBUNUHAN PENGIDAP SKIZOFRENIA PARANOID (STUDI KOMPARATIF PUTUSAN NOMOR 10/PID.B/2019/PN KPH DAN PUTUSAN NOMOR 150/PID.B/2024/PN JKT.BRT)) 22103060004_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (3MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Paranoid schizophrenia is a severe mental disorder that impairs an individual's ability to distinguish reality from delusion, often leading to uncontrolled aggressive behavior. In the context of homicide offenses, this condition creates a legal dilemma between retributive justice for victims and the humanitarian principle of protecting individuals incapable of full criminal responsibility. In Indonesia, the application of Article 44 of the Criminal Code (KUHP) to homicide perpetrators with paranoid schizophrenia remains inconsistent, as evidenced by Decision No. 10/Pid.B/2019/PN Kph, acquittal with mandatory medical rehabilitation and Decision No. 150/Pid.B/2024/PN Jkt.Brt, 16-year imprisonment, with Article 44 merely as a mitigating factor. This study employs a qualitative research design with a descriptive– analytical–comparative character and a normative approach. The data were collected through library research, with primary sources consisting of Decision Number 10/Pid.B/2019/PN Kph, Decision Number 150/Pid.B/2024/PN Jkt.Brt, and Article 44 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), supported by relevant literature and statutory regulations as secondary data. Data collection was conducted through document study and subsequently analyzed using a normativecomparative method to examine and compare the legal reasoning of both decisions in interpreting the element of “non-imputability.” The analysis aims to identify the juridical implications of judicial disparity on legal certainty within the Indonesian criminal justice system. The findings reveal that the lack of uniform interpretation of the element of “non-imputability” under Article 44 KUHP undermines the principle of legal certainty (rechtszekerheid). Juridical implications include disparities in the defendant's legal status, execution mechanisms, civil-administrative consequences, imbalances between rehabilitative and retributive aspects, and inadequate fulfillment of victims' rights (restitution, compensation, and long-term protection). This disparity stems from judges' subjective assessment of psychiatric expert testimony and the absence of standardized parameters for criminal responsibility.

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item