TINJAUAN SOSIOLOGIS TERHADAP PENGAWETAN DAN DISTRIBUSI DAGING KURBAN PADA PROGRAM “RENDANGMU” DI LAZISMU KLATEN

Muhammad Rofiq Alfarizi, NIM.: 22103080045 (2026) TINJAUAN SOSIOLOGIS TERHADAP PENGAWETAN DAN DISTRIBUSI DAGING KURBAN PADA PROGRAM “RENDANGMU” DI LAZISMU KLATEN. Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

Preview	Text (TINJAUAN SOSIOLOGIS TERHADAP PENGAWETAN DAN DISTRIBUSI DAGING KURBAN PADA PROGRAM “RENDANGMU” DI LAZISMU KLATEN) 22103080045_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (9MB) | Preview
	Text (TINJAUAN SOSIOLOGIS TERHADAP PENGAWETAN DAN DISTRIBUSI DAGING KURBAN PADA PROGRAM “RENDANGMU” DI LAZISMU KLATEN) 22103080045_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (12MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

This study examines the RendangMu Program at Lazismu Klaten through three focuses: the reasons for preserving and canning qurbani meat, the management flow and the contracts and transactions involved, and the effectiveness of distribution together with its social benefit. It uses empirical legal research with a descriptive-analytical and sociological approach. Primary data were obtained from interviews with eight informants consisting of two administrators/program managers and six beneficiaries, supported by and documentation. Secondary data include MUI and DSN-MUI fatwas, food-safety regulations, official Lazismu publications, and relevant previous studies. The data were analyzed through reduction, categorization, researcher interpretation, Max Weber’s rationality theory, Anthony Giddens’s theory of modernity, Islamic legal analysis, and comparison with prior research. The findings show that canning was selected in response to the limited shelf life, unequal distribution, and geographic limits of fresh meat. The relationship between donors and Lazismu contains elements of wakālah that require transparent explanation, while animal procurement and processing services constitute separate transactions that must be traceable. Distribution is qualitatively effective in targeting, timing flexibility, reach, ease of use, and social acceptance, but cannot be assessed absolutely because quantitative data on costs, beneficiary coverage, and laboratory verification of shelf life remain limited. Normatively, processing and delayed distribution are permissible insofar as they comply with Islamic requirements, food-safety standards, and demonstrable public benefit.

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item