HUKUM QURBAN SEMBELIHAN AHLI KITAB (STUDI KOMPARATIF PEMIKIRAN WAHBAH ZUHAILI DAN QURAISH SHIHAB)

Muhammad Malik Ibni Rizal, NIM.: 19103060076 (2025) HUKUM QURBAN SEMBELIHAN AHLI KITAB (STUDI KOMPARATIF PEMIKIRAN WAHBAH ZUHAILI DAN QURAISH SHIHAB). Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.

Preview	Text (HUKUM QURBAN SEMBELIHAN AHLI KITAB (STUDI KOMPARATIF PEMIKIRAN WAHBAH ZUHAILI DAN QURAISH SHIHAB)) 19103060076_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf - Published Version Download (9MB) | Preview
	Text (HUKUM QURBAN SEMBELIHAN AHLI KITAB (STUDI KOMPARATIF PEMIKIRAN WAHBAH ZUHAILI DAN QURAISH SHIHAB)) 19103060076_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Registered users only Download (5MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

This thesis examines the debated validity of ritual sacrifice (qurban/uḍḥiyah) when the slaughter is carried out by People of the Book (Ahl al-Kitāb) in a plural society. The issue arises because Q. 5:5 permits the food (ṭa‘ām) of Ahl al-Kitāb, while qurban is a devotional rite bound by specific requirements and the intention of drawing nearer to Allah. The study addresses two questions: (1) how Wahbah az-Zuḥailī and M. Quraish Shihab judge Ahl al-Kitāb slaughter and its implications for qurban; and (2) how Qiyās may be applied to the case of Ahl al-Kitāb slaughtering an animal intended for qurban. The research is library-based, descriptive-analytical, and comparative. Primary data are drawn from the works of Wahbah az-Zuḥailī and M. Quraish Shihab, supported by fiqh and uṣūl al-fiqh literature. Qiyās serves as the analytical framework by mapping its pillars (al-aṣl, al-far’, ḥukm al-aṣl, and ‘illah) to reconstruct each author’s method of legal reasoning. The findings show that both scholars refer to Q. 5:5 as the main textual basis and emphasize a strict monotheistic orientation: slaughter must not be devoted to other than Allah and must not involve invoking a name other than Allah. Wahbah az-Zuḥailī tends to present a more explicit juristic formulation and notes juristic disagreement regarding who may slaughter a qurban animal, including views requiring a Muslim slaughterer and views allowing Ahl al-Kitāb to slaughter through delegated agency (wakālah) provided that the conditions of lawful slaughter (tażkiyah) are met. Quraish Shihab highlights the devotional-symbolic dimension of qurban as a mansak, leading to a cautious preference for a Muslim slaughterer to avoid doubtful validity. In Qiyās terms, the permissibility of Ahl al-Kitāb slaughter can serve as the al-aṣl for the qurban case when the effective cause is lawful slaughter grounded in pure monotheism; however, if the ‘illah of qurban is understood primarily as a ta‘abbudī requirement that demands a Muslim performer, the analogy becomes weak and precaution should prevail.

Share this knowledge with your friends :

Actions (login required)

View Item